JON BARRI BROTHERS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JON BARRI BROTHERS, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
106 So. 3d 1010
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2013)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See Walker v. State, 682 So.2d 555 (Fla.1996). See also Buchman v. Canard, 926 So.2d 390 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (noting that doctrine of law of the case applies to a per curiam decision of the appellate courts); Bueno v. Bueno de Khawly, 677 So.2d 3, 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (holding that “[a] per curiam decision of the appellate court is the law of the case between the same parties on the same issues and facts, and determines all issues necessarily involved in the appeal, whether mentioned in the court’s opinion or not” (quoting Mitzenmacher v. Mitzenmacher, 656 So.2d 178, 179 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995))).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
J.J. v. State, 114 So. 3d 412 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See G.W. v. State, 106 So. 3d 83 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013); C.J. v. State, 106 So. 3d 1010 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013).…
Authorities Cited
- Lane Mitzenmacher v. Mitzenmacher, 656 So. 2d 178 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
- Walker v. State, 682 So. 2d 555 (Fla. 1996)
- Johnson v. State, 677 So. 2d 3 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)
- Buchman v. Canard, 926 So. 2d 390 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)