WILLIE CUYLER, SR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that while the trial court adequately conducted a Faretta inquiry before trial, it erred by failing to renew the offer of counsel at the sentencing stage, which is a critical stage. The conviction is affirmed, but the sentence is reversed and remanded.
[1] A trial court must conduct an adequate Faretta inquiry prior to allowing a defendant to represent themselves at trial.
[2] Once a defendant has waived counsel under Faretta, the offer of assistance of counsel must be renewed by the court at each critical stage of the proceedings.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceWillie Cuyler was convicted of resisting a law enforcement officer without violence. He challenges his judgment and sentence, arguing the trial court …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Faretta Inquiry cases and more on FLexlaw
The appellant, Willie Cuyler, challenges his judgment and sentence for resisting a law enforcement officer without violence, arguing that the trial court erred by failing to conduct an adequate Faretta1 inquiry at the outset of trial and failing to renew an offer of counsel prior to sentencing. We hold that the trial court conducted an adequate Faretta hearing prior to allowing Cuyler to represent himself at trial, and affirm his conviction accordingly. However, we reverse Cuyler’s sentence and remand for a new sentencing hearing prior to which the trial court must conduct an adequate Faretta inquiry.
The record demonstrates that the trial court moved directly into sentencing after the verdict was announced with*828out mentioning Cuyler’s right to counsel at that critical stage. While a full Faretta inquiry need not be conducted at every stage of criminal proceedings, once counsel has been waived under Faretta, the offer of assistance of counsel must be renewed by the court at each critical stage of the proceedings. Traylor v. State, 596 So.2d 957, 968 (Fla.1992) (holding that a critical stage of trial is “any stage that may significantly affect the outcome of the proceedings”). Sentencing is a critical stage of a criminal proceeding. See, e.g., Beard v. State, 751 So.2d 61, 62 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). A trial court’s failure to conduct a Faretta hearing at a critical stage of the criminal proceedings constitutes per se reversible error. See Tennis v. State, 997 So.2d 375, 379 (Fla.2008); Wilson v. State, 947 So.2d 1225, 1226-27 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).
The state concedes that remand for re-sentencing is required. We reverse the imposed sentence and remand for a new sentencing hearing.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
VAN NORTWICK, PADOVANO, and SWANSON, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Brooks v. State, 180 So. 3d 1094 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)…that a critical stage of trial is “any stage that may significantly ■affect.the outcome of the proceedings”). Sentencing is a critical stage of a criminal proceeding. See, e.g., Beard v. State, 751 So. 2d 61, 62 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). Cuyler v. State, 131 So. 3d 827, 828 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). “Failure to renew the offer of counsel at a critical stage and conduct a Faretta inquiry if the defendant rejects the renewed offer is per se reversible error.” Howard v. State, 147 So. 3d 1040, 1043 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). Br…
-
Howard v. State, 147 So. 3d 1040 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)…6 (Fla.1967); Miller v. State, 8 So. 3d 451, 453 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). Failure to renew the offer of counsel at a critical stage and conduct a Faretta inquiry if the defendant rejects the renewed offer is per se reversible error. See Cuyler v. State, 131 So. 3d 827, 828 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014); Travis v. State, 969 So. 2d 532, 533 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); Wilson v. State, 947 So. 2d 1225, 1226-27 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). Here, although the trial court repeatedly renewed the offer of counsel at the hearings leading up to…
-
EIB v. State, 191 So. 3d 977 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)…t a critical stage of the proceedings is reversible error. See Tennis, 997 So. 2d at 379; Tarver v. State, 145 So. 3d 911, 912 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014); Goldsmith, 937 So. 2d at 1256. Sentencing is a critical stage of the proceedings. See Cuyler v. State, 131 So. 3d 827, 828 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). Consequently, because the trial court failed to [*980] conduct a proper Faretta hearing, we must reverse Eib’s sentences and remand for resentencing.2 In addition to challenging the denial of his motion to proceed pro se,…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (U.S. 1975)
- Traylor v. State, 596 So. 2d 957 (Fla. 1992)
- Gabby Tennis v. State, 997 So. 2d 375 (Fla. 2008)
- Beard v. State, 751 So. 2d 61 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)
- Wilson v. State, 947 So. 2d 1225 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)