ALFRED WOODS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2014-02-17
No. 1D13-4352
PADOVANO and ROBERTS, JJ., concur., BENTON, J., concurs with Opinion.
132 So. 3d 925 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2014) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Gonzalez v. State, 101 So.3d 886, 888 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).

PADOVANO and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

BENTON, J., concurs with Opinion.

BENTON, J.,

concurring.

I concur on the ground that Alfred Woods is not serving a life sentence without possibility of parole.

Concurrence
BENTON, J.,

BENTON, J.,

concurring.

I concur on the ground that Alfred Woods is not serving a life sentence without possibility of parole.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Reed v. State, 154 So. 3d 455 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014)
    …t subsequently denied. “‘Prohibition is the appropriate remedy to prevent a trial court from proceeding against an accused after the erroneous denial of a motion for discharge based on a violation of the speedy trial [*457] rule.’ ” Hill v. State, 132 So. 3d 925, 930 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (quoting Cespedes v. State, 17 So. 3d 302, 303 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)). Based on the allegations in the petition for writ of prohibition, we ordered the State to file a response. The State, in its response, did not expressly ar…
  • Edge-Gougen v. State, 182 So. 3d 730 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)
    …4] § 19; § 901.01, Fla. Stat. (2015) (“Each state judicial officer is a conservator of the peace and has committing authority to issue warrants of arrest, commit offenders to jail, and recognize them to appear to answer the charge.”); Hill v. State, 132 So. 3d 925, 929 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (“Judicial officers of this state are conservators of the peace with actual authority to effec-. tuate arrests.”); see also Op. Att’y Gen. Fla. 77-79 (1977) (opining that a circuit Judge had authority to make warrantless arr…
  • Deriso v. State, 221 So. 3d 1231 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017)
    …remedy to prevent a trial court from proceeding against an accused after the erroneous denial of a motion for discharge based on a violation of the speedy trial rule.” Reed v. State, 154 So. 3d 455, 456-57 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (quoting Hill v. State, 132 So. 3d 925, 930 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)). Based on the allegations in the petition for writ of prohibition, we. ordered the State to file a response, which it did. The State conceded that the grounds stated by the trial court in denying both Deriso’s demand for di…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw