TIMUCUAN PROPERTIES, INC., APPELLANT,

v.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Bymel v. Bank OF Am., N.A., 159 So. 3d 345 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015)
  …on citing to Andresix for the proposition that a “purchaser of property that was subject of lis pendens arising from bank’s foreclosure action was not entitled to intervene in that action”); see also Timucuan Props., Inc. v. Bank of New York Mellon, 135 So. 3d 524, 524 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (per curiam affirmance citing to SADCO and Andre-six). The rule in Andresix is based on the “concern that to allow purchasers pen-dente lite to intervene would unnecessarily protract litigation.” Harrod v. Union Fin. Co., 42…
• Bonafide Props. Only Under 14329 Vill. View Dr Land Tr. v. Wells Fargo Bank, 198 So. 3d 694 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)
  …itburn took- the property subject to the outcome of the litigation in Wells Fargo’s case,, including .the foreclosure sale to which Wells Fargo was entitled as a result of the judgment entered in its favor.”); Timucuan Props. v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, 135 So. 3d 524, 524 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (“This court is committed to the doctrine that a purchaser pendente life is not entitled to intervene.” (quoting Intermediary Fin. Corp. v. McKay, 111 So. 531, 531 (Fla.1927))); SADCO, Inc. v. Countrywide Funding, Inc., 680…
• Bank of Am., N.A. v. Mirabella Owners' Ass'n, Inc., 238 So. 3d 405 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)

Authorities Cited

• Intermediary Fin. Corp. v. McKay, 93 Fla. 101 (Fla. 1927)
• Andresix Corp. v. Peoples Downtown Nat'l Bank, 419 So. 2d 1107 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
• Sadco, Inc. v. Countrywide Funding, Inc., 680 So. 2d 1072 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)