DIRAN PAPAZIAN, APPELLANT,
v.
JOHN KULHANJIAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS A STOCKHOLDER OF ARMENIAN HOTEL OWNERS, INC., SUING ON BEHALF OF SAID CORPORATION, APPELLEE
This is an appeal from a final decree entered upon an accounting by the appellant Papazian pursuant to the mandate of this court in Armenian Hotel Owners, Inc., v. Kulhanjian, Fla. 1957, 96 So.2d 146; Id., Fla., 96 So.2d 896.
We have carefully examined the Master’s Report upon which the final decree was based and find no error except as to the item of $2,000 expended by Papazian for the lease assignment. Under the circumstances shown by this record, it is our view that, in equity and good conscience, Papazian should have received credit for this expenditure.
Accordingly, the decree should be modified to reflect a credit to Papazian of $2,000 and, as so modified, is affirmed.
It is so ordered.
TERRELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Skelton v. Davis, 133 So. 2d 432 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961)…ll apply and be followed in this cause.” The three children who had not joined in the petition for a curator appealed from the decree of the circuit court. The Supreme Court in affirming the decree appointing the curator, Davis v. Carter, Fla.1958, 107 So. 2d 129, noted that prior to the curatorship proceedings, Annie B. Davis was able to rely on a son who until his death had advised and assisted her in the management of her financial affairs. In addition, the court took cognizance of the animosity existing…
Authorities Cited
- Armenian Hotel Owners, Inc., 96 So. 2d 896 (Fla. 1957)
- Armenian Hotel Owners, Inc. v. Kulhanjian, 96 So. 2d 146 (Fla. 1956)