SHABAN MOHAMMAD, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2014-05-21
No. 3D13-546
Before SUAREZ, LAGOA, and LOGUE, JJ.
138 So. 3d 1174 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2014) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Mohammad appealed the denial of his motion to correct his sentence for a probation violation, arguing he was entitled to credit for all time served. The Third District Court of Appeal agreed and held that a defendant sentenced for probation violation is generally entitled to full credit for time served unless there is a clear waiver on the record.


Holding

A defendant who receives a sentence as a result of a probation violation is generally entitled to all credit for time served unless there is a clear waiver on the record. Because there was no evidence of such a waiver in Mohammad's case, he was entitled to full credit for all time previously served.


Headnotes

[1] A defendant who receives a sentence as a result of a violation of probation is generally entitled to all credit for time served, including time spent in jail awaiting the…

[2] Jail time credit is not forfeited when a defendant is resentenced as a result of a violation of probation or community control.

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“a defendant who receives a sentence as a result of a violation of probation is generally entitled to all credit for time served, including time spent in jail awaiting the resolution of the original case; the time served upon his original sentence; and time served in jail pending the outcome of the subsequent probation violation.”

Establishes the primary holding regarding entitlement to credit for time served in probation violation cases.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Mohammad received a sentence based on a plea bargain admitting to violation of probation from an earlier conviction. He sought an award of credit for …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
LOGUE, J.

LOGUE, J.

Shaban Mohammad appeals from an order denying his motion to correct his sentence. The sentence was entered based upon Mohammad’s plea bargain with the State admitting to violating his probation from an earlier conviction. Mohammad seeks an award of all credit for time previously served in his case.

In the first place, we agree with the First, Second, Fourth, and Fifth Districts that a defendant who receives a sentence as a result of a violation of probation is generally entitled to all credit for time served, including time spent in jail awaiting the resolution of the original case; the time served upon his original sentence; and time served in jail pending the outcome of the subsequent probation violation. Barnes v. State, 74 So.3d 1135, 1136 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (“[A] probation violator sentenced to prison is entitled to credit for time served in jail awaiting the original probationary sentence”) (citation omitted); Powell v. State, 763 So.2d 364, 366 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (“A defendant who is re-sentenced to prison after violation of the probationary portion of his split sentence is entitled to credit for time actually served on the prison portion of his split sentence prior to the commencement of the probationary term.”); Tomiuk v. State, 663 So.2d 681 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“[J]ail time credit is not forfeited when a defendant is resentenced as a result of a violation of probation or community control.”); Bowers v. State, 645 So.2d 1108 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (“We reverse and remand for correction of the sentence to credit Bowers for actual time served on his original sentence ... plus 55 days previously credited for time served prior to imposition of the original sentence”).

The exceptions to this doctrine do not apply here. In particular, there is no evidence in the record that Mohammad waived his entitlement to full credit for time served as part of his plea with the court. Accordingly, we reverse and remand with instructions that the trial court enter a sentence that reflects full credit for time served. See Lopez v. State, 103 So.3d 991, 993 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (“At no time did the sentencing court discuss with Lopez a waiver of any credit for time served; nor did the court condition its acceptance of the plea upon Lopez waiving such credit. Under these circumstances, and in the absence of a waiver on the record, the trial court did not have the authority to impose a sentence without granting Lopez credit for all time previously served in the county jail.”); Ryan v. State, 837 So.2d 1075,1076 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (“[Ajlthough a defendant can waive credit for time served as part of a plea agreement, such waiver must be clearly shown on the record.”).

Reversed and remanded.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Barbesco v. State, 264 So. 3d 338 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)
    …pite that the credit had been miscalculated). Absent an express and specific waiver of jail credit as a condition of a plea agreement, all such credit must be awarded at a resentencing upon a probation violation. See generally Mohammad v. State, 138 So. 3d 1174 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014). Accordingly, in this case, it is irrelevant whether Appellant was legally entitled to the jail credit he now seeks. There is no dispute that it was previously awarded, and there is no indication that Appellant waived it…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw