JOE PLAIN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2014-06-25
No. 4D14-434
DAMOORGIAN, C.J., MAY and FORST, JJ., concur.
141 So. 3d 696 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2014) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Appellant committed his burglary offense in 1997 before the legislature superseded the holding of State v. Huggins, 802 So.2d 276 (Fla.2001). See Shiflet v. State, 50 So.3d 1153 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). The jury made no finding that the dwelling was occupied, and the jury’s failure to make that finding was not harmless under the circumstances of this case. Appellant has demonstrated that his mandatory life sentence as a prison release reoffender for burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery is illegal. Suffield v. State, 132 So.3d 333, 333 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Tumblin v. State, 965 So.2d 354, 356 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). We remand for resentencing.

Reversed and Remanded for Resentenc-ing.

DAMOORGIAN, C.J., MAY and FORST, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Fratcher v. State, 191 So. 3d 953 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)
    …on to correct illegal sentence. Appellant’s conviction for burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery, which did not. specify whether the dwelling was occupied, does not qualify for prison releasee reoffender (PRR) sentencing. Plain v. State, 141 So. 3d 696, 696 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Suffield v. State, 132 So. 3d 333, 334 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Tumblin v. State, 965 So. 2d 354, 356 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); see also Ellis v. State, 135 So. 3d 478, 480 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014); Santiago v. State, 76 So. 3d 1027, 1031…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw