HERMAN LUTSKY, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,
v.
ROCHELLE SCHOENWETTER, APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that an order granting a temporary injunction must specify the reasons for its entry and contain clear findings of fact supporting the four elements of an injunction, and that purely monetary injury is not irreparable.
Herman Lutsky appealed an order granting a temporary injunction on Rochelle Schoenwetter's motion. The order did not contain the necessary findings of…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Temporary Injunction cases and more on FLexlaw
Herman Lutsky appeals, and Rochelle Schoenwetter cross-appeals, an order granting a temporary injunction on Scho-enwetter’s motion. We reverse and vacate the order.
Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610 requires that a court’s injunctive order specify the reasons' for the entry of the injunction and contain clear, definite and unequivocal findings of fact to support the four elements of an injunction. Angelino v. Santa Barbara Enter., LLC, 2 So.3d 1100 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009); City of Sunny Isles Beach v. Temple B’Nai Zion, Inc., 43 So.3d 904, 906 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010). The order in this case does not contain the necessary findings. Neither did the moving party meet her burden of alleging and proving the facts entitling her to relief. Chevaldina v. R.K./FL Mgmt., Inc., 133 So.3d 1086, 1089 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014).
The injunction must also be reversed because the injury the .movant was attempting to prevent is purely monetary. As this Court has stated, irreparable injury is injury that cannot be cured by money damages. Grove Isle Ass’n, Inc. v. Grove Isle Assoc., LLLP, 137 So.3d 1081, 1092 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014). Injunctive relief is not available when the right to the injunction is premised on a speculative, future event. Biscayne Park, LLC, v, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, 34 So.3d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA *5352010). These deficiencies require that the order be reversed.
Reversed; order vacated.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sammie Invs. v. Strategica Cap. Assocs., 247 So. 3d 596 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)
-
Credo LLC v. Speyside Invs. Corp., 259 So. 3d 893 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)
Authorities Cited
- Grove Isle Ass'n, Inc. v. Grove Isle Assocs., LLLP, 137 So. 3d 1081 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)
- Chevaldina v. R.K./FL Mgmt., Inc., 133 So. 3d 1086 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)
- Angelino v. Santa Barbara Enters., LLC, 2 So. 3d 1100 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)
- Biscayne Park, LLC v. Wal-Mart Stores E., LP, 34 So. 3d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)
- City OF Sunny Isles Beach v. Temple B'Nai Zion, Inc., 43 So. 3d 904 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)