JOHNNY BERNARD HALL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2016-01-06
No. 2D14-2321
ALTENBERND and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
181 So. 3d 581 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2016)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the State failed to prove Mr. Hall acted willfully in violating the domestic violence injunction, as he reasonably concluded it was no longer in effect.


Facts & Procedural History

Johnny Bernard Hall was convicted of felony battery and violation of a domestic violence injunction. The victim's statements led Hall to reasonably be…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Judge.

WALLACE, Judge.

Johnny Bernard Hall appeals his judgment and sentences for felony battery under section 784.03(2), Florida Statutes (2013), and violation of an injunction for protection against domestic violence under section 741.31(4)(a)(3), Florida Statutes (2013). We affirm in part and reverse in part.

In order to obtain a conviction for violation of the domestic violence injunction, the State was required to prove that Mr. Hall acted “willfully” in violating the injunction. § 741.31(4)(a)(3). In this context, “willfully” means “knowingly, intentionally and purposely.” Fla. Std. Jury Instr. (Crim.) 8.18; cf. Gaspard v. State, 848 So.2d 1161, 1162 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (holding that knowledge by an accused that an injunction is in effect is an essential element of the crime of aggravated stalking after the entry of a domestic violence injunction). It was undisputed at trial that the victim’s statements led Mr. Hall reasonably to conclude that the domestic violence injunction was no longer in effect. Accordingly, the trial court erred in failing to grant Mr. Hall’s motion for a judgment of acquittal on the charge of violation of the domestic violence injunction.

We affirm Mr. Hall’s judgment and sentence for felony battery without comment. We reverse the judgment and sentence for violation of the injunction against domestic violence and remand for Mr. Hall’s discharge on the latter offense.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

ALTENBERND and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw