ANGEL E. CUESTA, APPELLANT,
v.
CAROLYN A. CUESTA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Entitlement cases and more on FLexlaw
We affirm without discussion: (1) that portion of the circuit court’s final order denying the former husband’s supplemental petition for termination or, in the alternative,, reduction in spousal support; and (2) the. circuit court’s order denying the former , husband’s motion for rehearing. We dismiss without prejudice the former husband’s appeal of that portion of the final order granting the former wife’s motion for attorney’s fees and costs, but reserving jurisdiction to determine those amounts. See Revier v. Revier, 45 So.3d 570, 571 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (“We dismiss [the] aspect of the final judgment as it relates to the award of attorney’s fees since the trial court determined only entitlement and reserved the determination of amount for a future day.”).
*616 Affirmed in part, dismissed without prejudice in part.
TAYLOR, DAMOORGIAN and GERBER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Voorhees v. Voorhees, 204 So. 3d 75 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)…eadings. However, we note from the record that’ the court reserved jurisdiction to determine the amount of the former wife’s attorney’s fees. As a result, we are required to dismiss this portion of the appeal without prejudice. See Cuesta v. Cuesta, 186 So. 3d 615, 615 (Fla. 4th DCA [*78] 2016) (“We dismiss without prejudice the former husband’s appeal of that portion of the final order granting the former wife’s motion for attorney’s fees and costs, but reserving jurisdiction to determine those amounts.”) (c…
Authorities Cited
- Revier v. Revier, 45 So. 3d 570 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)