RICARDO AYBAR, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2016-11-23
No. 3D15-1078
Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and SCALES, JJ.
207 So. 3d 340 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2016)


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Ricardo Aybar, appeals the trial court’s order denying the defendant’s motion to suppress his blood alcohol test results. The record does not reflect a written order by the trial court finding that the suppression ruling would be dis-positive, nor is there a stipulation in the record that the ruling would be dispositive. Consequently, this Court has no jurisdiction to review the matter, and the appeal is dismissed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i)1; Williams v. State, 194 So.3d 511 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016); Pena v. State, 913 So.2d 1203, 1205 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (stating “[b]ecause we have concluded that the order on appeal was not dis-positive and the exception to the rule does not apply, we have no jurisdiction to reach the merits of this case.”).

Dismissed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw