WILLIE THOMAS, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a trial court cannot deny bond when the state has not filed a motion for pretrial detention and the charged offenses are not capital or life felonies.
Willie Thomas was charged with several offenses and the trial court denied his requests for bond. Thomas petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus, argui…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Pretrial Release cases and more on FLexlaw
Willie Thomas petitions our court for a writ of habeas corpus. The State charged Thomas with attempted second-degree murder with a firearm, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, carrying a concealed firearm, and possession of cocaine. After two separate hearings, the trial court denied Thomas’s requests for bond. Thomas argues the trial court erred by denying bond because the State never filed a motion for pretrial detention. We agree and grant the petition.
Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.131(a) provides, “Unless charged with a capital offense or an offense punishable by life imprisonment and the proof of guilt is evident or the presumption is great, every person charged with a crime or violation of municipal or county ordinance shall be entitled to pretrial release on reasonable conditions.” If the State does not move for pretrial detention, or if its motion is facially insufficient, “the judicial officer shall proceed to determine the conditions of release pursuant to the provisions of rule 3.131(b).” Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.132(a).
Here, none of the charged offenses are capital felonies or life felonies. Under these circumstances, if the State fails to move for pretrial detention, a trial court *327may not deny a defendant’s motion for bond. See Jenkins v. State, 86 So.3d 1273, 1274 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012); Kelly v. State, 939 So.2d 1150, 1151 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). Accordingly, we grant Thomas’s petition and direct the trial court to conduct a pretrial release hearing pursuant to rule 3.131 no later than three business days following the issuance of this opinion. We note that our decision is without prejudice to the State’s ability to file a motion for pretrial detention, if it so chooses. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.132(a) (“A motion for pretrial detention may be filed at any time prior to trial.”).
PETITION GRANTED.
SAWAYA, ORFINGER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Mayorquin v. State of Fla. & Louis A. Quinones, JR. (Fla. 5th DCA 2022)…So. 3d 1120, 1121 (Fla. 5th DCA 2021); Rhagnanan v. State, 232 So. 3d 524, 525 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017); Thermidor v. State, 146 So. 3d 95, 97 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014); Hernandez v. Roth, 890 So. 2d 1173, 1174 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); see also Thomas v. State, 208 So. 3d 326, 326–27 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) (“If the State does not move for pretrial detention, or if its motion is facially insufficient, ‘the judicial officer shall proceed to determine the conditions of release pursuant to the provisions of [R]ule 3.131(b).’…
-
Perano v. State (Fla. 5th DCA 2024)…ment”); Rodriguez v. State, 269 So. 3d 639, 640 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019) (granting the petition for writ of habeas corpus “[b]ecause the State did not seek pretrial detention and the new charges did not allege a capital or life felony”); Thomas v. State, 208 So. 3d 326, 326–27 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) (“Here, none of the charged offenses are capital felonies or life felonies. Under these circumstances, if the State fails to move for pretrial detention, a trial court may not deny a defendant’s motion for bond.”). Accor…
-
Perano v. State (Fla. 5th DCA 2024)…ment”); Rodriguez v. State, 269 So. 3d 639, 640 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019) (granting the petition for writ of habeas corpus “[b]ecause the State did not seek pretrial detention and the new charges did not allege a capital or life felony”); Thomas v. State, 208 So. 3d 326, 326–27 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) (“Here, none of the charged offenses are capital felonies or life felonies. Under these circumstances, if the State fails to move for pretrial detention, a trial court may not deny a defendant’s motion for bond.”). Accor…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Brown v. State, 939 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)
- Corrie Kelly v. State, 939 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)
- Jenkins v. State, 86 So. 3d 1273 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012)