JOANNE PERANO
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court may not deny a defendant's motion for bond when the defendant is not charged with a capital or life felony and the State has not sought pretrial detention pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.132.
[1] A trial court may not deny a defendant's motion for bond if the State fails to move for pretrial detention and the charged offenses are not capital or life felonies.
[2] A writ of habeas corpus may be granted when a trial court errs by denying a motion to set bond without the State seeking pretrial detention.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Under these circumstances, if the State fails to move for pretrial detention, a trial court may not deny a defendant's motion for bond.”
Quote from Thomas v. State, cited in support of the court's holding on the substantive legal standard.
Joanne Perano was charged with aggravated stalking after injunction, a third-degree felony. The trial court denied her motion to set bond after a bond…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Conditions Of Release cases and more on FLexlaw
March 28, 2024 WALLIS, J.
Petitioner petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus, arguing that she is being illegally detained without the benefit of a bond on the charge of aggravated stalking after injunction, a third-degree felony, following a bond hearing. The State has not filed a motion seeking pretrial detention pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.132.
Petitioner correctly argues, and the State correctly concedes, that the trial court erred by denying the motion to set bond. See Kendall v. State, 290 So. 3d 150, 150 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020) (granting “the petition for writ of habeas corpus because, as the State candidly concede[d], ‘the State did not seek pretrial detention’ and Kendall [was] not charged with a capital felony or a felony punishable by life imprisonment”); Rodriguez v. State, 269 So. 3d 639, 640 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019) (granting the petition for writ of habeas corpus “[b]ecause the State did not seek pretrial detention and the new charges did not allege a capital or life felony”); Thomas v. State, 208 So. 3d 326, 326–27 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) (“Here, none of the charged offenses are capital felonies or life felonies. Under these circumstances, if the State fails to move for pretrial detention, a trial court may not deny a defendant’s motion for bond.”).
Accordingly, we grant the petition, without prejudice to the State to file a Motion for Pretrial Detention pursuant to Rule 3.132, should it choose to do so. We remand for an expedited hearing, which will either address a Rule 3.132 Motion, if filed by the State, or determine reasonable conditions of release pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.131.
PETITION GRANTED. JAY and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
_____________________________
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State Farm Fla. Ins. Co. v. Crispin, 44 Fla. L. Weekly D2953 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020)
- Thomas v. State, 208 So. 3d 326 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017)