RING POWER CORPORATION, DIESEL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, AND MARK DAVID QUANDT, APPELLANTS,
v.
GERARDO CONDADO-PEREZ AND NANCY RODRIGUEZ-VENTURA, APPELLEES
RING POWER CORPORATION, DIESEL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, AND MARK DAVID QUANDT, APPELLANTS,
GERARDO CONDADO-PEREZ AND NANCY RODRIGUEZ-VENTURA, APPELLEES
224 So. 3d 885
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2017)
Positive Treatment
Opinion of the Court
In light of the reversal of the underlying judgment on which the attorney’s fee order in this appeal is based, Ring Power Corp. v. Condado-Perez, 219 So.3d 1028, 1030 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017), we reverse the order on attorney’s fees. See ARC Foods, Inc. v. MGI Props., 746 So.2d 514, 514 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Siegel v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, 100 So.3d 783, 784 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); S & I Invs. v. Payless Flea Mkt., Inc., 40 So.3d 48, 49 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).
Reversed.
KHOUZAM, SALARIO, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Ring Power Corp. v. Condado-Perez, 219 So. 3d 1028 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)
- ARC Foods, Inc. v. MGI Props., 746 So. 2d 514 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)
- S & I Invs. v. Payless Flea Mkt., Inc., 40 So. 3d 48 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)
- Siegel v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, 100 So. 3d 783 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)