ANTHONY RAY RHAGNANAN, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Ray Rhagnanan was arrested for attempted second-degree murder, possession of cannabis with intent to sell or deliver, and attempted possession of cannabis over.twenty grams. At first appearance, the presiding judge granted reasonable bond on the latter two charges but denied bond for the attempted second-degree murder. Rhagnanan petitions for a writ of habeas corpus, arguing that his present pretrial detention without bond is illegal. The State concedes error; We grant the writ and remand for an expedited hearing.

Unless a person is charged with a capital offense or an offense punishable by life imprisonment and the. proof of guilt is evident or the presumption is great, the person is entitled to pretrial release on reasonable conditions. See Art. I, § 14, Fla. Const.; Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.131; Thermidor v. State, 146 So.3d 95, 96 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014). Attempted • second-degree murder is not a capital offense or an offense punishable by life imprisonment. It is a second-degree felony,1 thus entitling Rhagnanan to'a pretrial release on reasonable conditions, absent the court granting a proper motion from the State' seeking pretrial detention. Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.132(a) provides that the State may file with the judicial officer at first appearance a motion seeking pretrial detention, “setting forth with particularity the grounds and the essential facts on which pretrial detention is sought and certifying that the state attorney has received testimony under oath supporting the grounds and the essential facts alleged in the motion.” No such written motion was filed, and the State’s oral motion made at first appearance is nót sufficient under this rule. This rule further provides that if no motion is filed, the judicial officer may inquire whether the State intends to file a motion for ‘pretrial detention, and if so, grant the State no more than three days to file the motion. “Upon’a showing by the State of probable cause that the defendant committed the offense and exigent circumstances, the defendant shall be detained in custody pending the filing of the motion.” Id, Here, the first appearance judge never made this inquiry nor was there a showing or finding of exigent circumstances prior *525to the judge denying bond at the very brief first appearance hearing.

Accordingly, because the procedures for pretrial detention were not followed, we grant thé petition for writ of habeas corpus and remand to the trial court to set an expedited hearing to determine the issue of pretrial release or detention consistent with rules 3.131 and 3.132.

PETITION . GRANTED; CAUSE REMANDED.

EVANDER, BERGER, arid LAMBERT, JJ., copcur.