BILLY JAMES BARTON
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A defendant charged with a non-capital offense is entitled to pretrial release on reasonable conditions unless the State files a motion for pretrial detention and establishes that no condition of release can reasonably protect the community and assure the defendant's presence in court.
[1] A defendant charged with a non-capital offense has a constitutional right to pretrial release on reasonable conditions unless the State files a motion for pretrial detent…
[2] A trial court may not deny bail on new charges solely because the defendant was on pretrial release when those charges were committed; the Parker doctrine permitting bond…
Previewing 2 of 2 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Parker alone cannot be used as a basis to hold a defendant without bond as to any charges for which the defendant was not already on a form of pretrial release.”
Court explaining the limits of using prior bond status to deny bail on new charges
Barton was arrested in Citrus County for misdemeanor resisting arrest and released on bond. While on that bond, he was arrested in Marion County for d…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Revocation Of Bond cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
BILLY JAMES BARTON,
Petitioner,
v. Case No. 5D21-168
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent.
________________________________/
Opinion filed January 26, 2021
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, A Case of Original Jurisdiction.
Matthews R. Bark of Matthews R. Bark, P.A., Altamonte Springs, for Petitioner.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela
J.
Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Billy James Barton petitions this Court for an emergency writ of habeas corpus, alleging he is being unlawfully detained in Marion County when he should be eligible for pretrial release. The State commendably concedes that Petitioner is entitled to pretrial release regarding his arrest in Marion County. We agree and remand with instructions
2 for the court in Marion County to promptly conduct a hearing to set a reasonable bond or other appropriate conditions for Petitioner’s pretrial release. Petitioner was first arrested in Citrus County and charged with misdemeanor resisting arrest. While he was out on bond for the Citrus County case, he was arrested in Marion County and charged with possession of methamphetamine, and possession of cocaine, less than 28 grams. He was denied bail in the Marion County case because he allegedly committed the Marion County offenses while out on bond from Citrus County. “When a defendant commits a new offense while out on bond, the trial court can, sua sponte, revoke the bond in the earlier offense.” Rodriguez v. State, 269 So. 3d 639, 640 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019) (citing Parker v. State, 843 So. 2d 871, 878 (Fla. 2003)). Thus, Petitioner’s bond in the Citrus County case could have been revoked. However, the trial court erred in refusing bond regarding Petitioner’s Marion case simply because he was already on pretrial release when he supposedly committed the crimes in Marion County. “Parker alone cannot be used as a basis to hold a defendant without bond as to any charges for which the defendant was not already on a form of pretrial release.” Alexander v. Judd, 930 So. 2d 847, 849 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); see Rodriguez, 269 So. 3d at 640. Every person charged with a crime that is not a capital offense or offense punishable by life imprisonment is entitled to pretrial release on reasonable conditions, unless no condition of release can reasonably protect the community and assure the defendant’s presence in court. See Art. I, § 14, Fla. Const.; see also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.131(a) (2020). Petitioner is not charged with a capital offense or one punishable by imprisonment for life. Furthermore, the State has not filed a motion seeking pretrial detention pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.132(a). If the State does not
ORFINGER, EDWARDS and TRAVER, JJ., concur.
1 The petition is granted without prejudice to the State to file a motion for pretrial detention, should it choose to do so. See Kendall v. State, 290 So. 3d 150 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020); Rodriguez v. State, 269 So. 3d 639, 640 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019). We are confident that if the State, on remand, asks the trial court to consider Petitioner’s prior criminal record or his track record for attending court in setting reasonable conditions for pretrial release, it will offer admissible evidence regarding same.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State Farm Fla. Ins. Co. v. Crispin, 44 Fla. L. Weekly D2953 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020)
- Cephas v. Mark J. Letzter, M.D., 843 So. 2d 871 (Fla. 2003)
- Alexander v. Grady Judd, 930 So. 2d 847 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)
- Rhagnanan v. State, 232 So. 3d 524 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017)
- Rodriguez v. State of Fla. & Bryan Holt, 269 So. 3d 639 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019)