IN RE COURT COMMITTEE TO STUDY AND REPORT ON QUESTION OF METHODS OF DETERMINING THOSE WHO SHOULD BE ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN FLORIDA

Fla. | 1960-06-08
THOMAS, C. J., and TERRELL, HOB-SON, ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.
121 So. 2d 154 Florida Supreme Court (1960) Caution
Cited by 26 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Anything in the opinion filed May 23, 1960, Fla., 120 So.2d 78S, in the above matter to the contrary notwithstanding, that portion of the recommendations of the committee relating to “Subjects of Examination” appearing on pages 17 to 20, both inclusive, of the report filed with the Clerk of this Court, shall apply only to the March, 1961 and subsequent examinations to be conducted by said Board.

THOMAS, C. J., and TERRELL, HOB-SON, ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (13 total)

  • Craig v. Cochran, 132 So. 2d 196 (Fla. 1961)
    …the possibility of probation with the trial judge prior to sentencing of petitioner. It is clear that the petitioner’s parents had actual notice of the charges pending against him. This is all that the statute requires. Bowen v. Cochran, Fla.1960, 121 So. 2d 154. Petitioner was arrested on August 16, entered a plea of guilty on September 16, and was sentenced on November 7, 1960. The parents had adequate opportunity to act to advise petitioner and to act to protect his rights. Petitioner’s real complaint…
  • Doll Holloway v. State, 216 So. 2d 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968)
    …statutory notice is not mandatory where the parents have actual notice of the charges against the minor prior to his trial and have reasonable op [*250] portunity for consultation and advice to and with the minor. Thus in Bowen v. Cochran, Fla.1960, 121 So. 2d 154, the Supreme Court said: “Our examination of the record before us discloses that, although the petitioner’s parents were not notified either by service of summons or by registered mail, they did, in fact, receive actual notice of their son’s predic…
    1 / 2
  • McINTOSH v. State, 274 So. 2d 23 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973)
    …e. In Snell v. Mayo, Fla.1956, 84 So. 2d 581, our Supreme Court held that actual notice received through regular mail was sufficient, despite a claim that the notice was not [*24] served in the usual manner. Affirmance in Bowen v. Cochran, Fla.1960, 121 So. 2d 154, rested upon a finding of actual notice based on proof that the petitioner’s parents had visited him at the jail two weeks before trial. In Johnson v. Cochran, Fla.1960, 124 So. 2d 488, the file contained a receipt from “Fanny M. Johnson” and eviden…

Previewing 3 of 13 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw