JOHN W. CRAIG, PETITIONER,
v.
H. G. COCHRAN, JR., DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1961-07-19
No. 40051
ROBERTS, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.
132 So. 2d 196 Florida Supreme Court (1961) Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that actual notice of charges to parents of a minor is sufficient under the statute, and notice of arraignment or sentencing dates is not required.


Facts & Procedural History

A minor petitioner sought habeas corpus, alleging illegal confinement because his parents were not notified of proceedings leading to his detention. T…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

John W. Craig, petitioned this Court for writ of habeas corpus alleging that he was illegally confined because, although he was a minor at the time of the proceedings leading to the present detention, the State did not comply with Sec. 932.38, F.S.A.

We issued the writ and the respondent filed his return. To the return is attached a transcript of a statement taken of petitioner’s mother by the assistant county solicitor of Polk County after the issuance of the writ.

The return and the abovementioned statement show that petitioner’s parents visited him in the county jail on numerous occasions and knew of the charges against him prior to the petitioner’s pleading guilty. It is also shown that petitioner’s parents discussed the possibility of probation with the trial judge prior to sentencing of petitioner.

It is clear that the petitioner’s parents had actual notice of the charges pending against him. This is all that the statute requires. Bowen v. Cochran, Fla.1960, 121 So.2d 154.

Petitioner was arrested on August 16, entered a plea of guilty on September 16, and was sentenced on November 7, 1960. The parents had adequate opportunity to act to advise petitioner and to act to protect his rights.

Petitioner’s real complaint seems to be that his parents were not notified of the date of his arraignment and the date on which he was to be sentenced. The statute does not require notice of these events to be given to the parents of a minor.

On this further consideration it appears that the petition is without merit. The writ of habeas corpus heretofore issued is discharged and the petitioner is remanded to the custody of the respondent.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Doll Holloway v. State, 216 So. 2d 248 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968)
    …nor’s best interests.” See also to the same effect Falagon v. State, Fla.App.1966, 186 So. 2d 804; Bran-son v. Cochran, Fla.1962, 138 So. 2d 316; Milligan v. State, 1933, 109 Fla. 219, 147 So. 260 (a death penalty case); Craig v. Cochran, Fla.1961, 132 So. 2d 196; DiMarco v. Cochran, Fla.1961, 127 So. 2d 674; Brockman v. Cochran, Fla.1961, 127 So. 2d 443; Johnson v. Cochran, Fla.1960, 124 So. 2d 488; Bowen v. Cochran, Fla.1960, 121 So. 2d 154; Clay v. State, 1940, 143 Fla. 204, 196 So. 462; James v. State, 1…
  • McINTOSH v. State, 274 So. 2d 23 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973)
    …etitioner’s allegation was found to be false. The record showed that .he had been abandoned by his father as a child and that his mother visited the jail repeatedly over a period of three and one-half months before trial. Craig v. Cochran, Fla.1961, 132 So. 2d 196, is to like effect. Perhaps the closest case to the present one is McGuirk v. Cochran, Fla.1961, 126 So. 2d 555, in which the State proved knowledge on the parent’s part that the petitioner was “in the Dade County Jail awaiting trial.” That is slig…
  • Long v. State, 162 So. 2d 521 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Craig v. Cochran, Fla. 1961, 132 So. 2d 196; Bowen v. Cochran, Fla.1960, 121 So. 2d 154. SMITH, C. J., and ALLEN and SHANNON, JJ., concur.…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw