FLORA B. MOSLEY, APPELLANT,
v.
JAMES E. MOSLEY, APPELLEE
FLORA B. MOSLEY, APPELLANT,
JAMES E. MOSLEY, APPELLEE
124 So. 2d 314
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1960)
Caution
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
We have reviewed the record in the light of the arguments as to each point presented and hold that error has not been demonstrated. Pross v. Pross, Fla.1954, 72 So.2d 671; Glassman v. Deauville Enterprises, Inc., Fla.App.1958, 99 So.2d 641.
Our disposition of this appeal is not to be construed as affecting in any manner the right of the parties to litigate any matters, including property rights, not settled by the final decree appealed.
Affirmed.
WIGGINTON, C. J., and STURGIS and CARROLL, DONALD K„ JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Futch v. Head, 511 So. 2d 314 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)…t was not, and affirm. The agreement between Head and Futch was outside the statute because its subject was not the transfer of land from one of the contracting parties to the other. See Russell v. Thielen, 82 So. 2d 143 (Fla.1955); Blynn v. Hirsch, 124 So. 2d 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960). Futch would distinguish the Russell decision by contending that Russell, unlike the instant case, concerned joint venturers. Futch submits that Head never proved at trial that the two were joint venturers. Therefore, Futch conclu…
-
Alvarez v. Alvarez, 800 So. 2d 280 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)…rauds. Pursuant to section 725.01, an oral agreement to transfer an interest in land is unenforceable. McCloud v. Davison, 719 So. 2d 995, 997 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Avery v. Marine Bank & Trust Co., 216 So. 2d 251 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968); Blynn v. Hirsch, 124 So. 2d 314, 315 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960). Contrary to Elsa’s interpretation of the alleged oral agreement, the agreement does not involve an agreement to convey an interest in real property; rather, the alleged oral agreement is an agreement to perform labor and ser…
-
Blynn v. Hirsch, 136 So. 2d 666 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962)…y, that portion of the decree which denied costs to the appellant is reversed, and the cause is remanded for the entry of a cost judgment in favor of the appellant for those costs legally taxable. Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded. . 124 So. 2d 314.…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Pross v. Pross, 72 So. 2d 671 (Fla. 1954)
- Long v. Long, 99 So. 2d 641 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958)