TYRIE DEVEONTA THEOPHILE
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 4th DCA | 2018-03-07
No. 16-2841
Strine C.J.
240 So. 3d 15 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2018) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 43 Fla. L. Weekly D136
Cited by 1 case

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Defendant appealed his convictions for second-degree murder, aggravated battery, and robbery, along with a 45-year sentence. The court affirmed the convictions but vacated the sentence, finding the trial court considered a fact at sentencing that directly contradicted the jury's verdict.


Holding

The trial court erred in considering facts at sentencing that directly contradicted the jury's verdict regarding firearm possession. Accordingly, the sentence was vacated and the case was remanded for resentencing before a different circuit judge, while the underlying convictions were affirmed.


Headnotes

[1] At sentencing, a trial court may not rely upon a factual finding that directly contradicts the jury's verdict, and error in doing so warrants vacation of sentence and rem…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The defendant was convicted of second-degree murder, aggravated battery, and robbery. During sentencing, the trial court stated that the defendant pul…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Karen M. Miller, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502012CF001011AMB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Matthew Steven Ocksrider, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

KUNTZ, J. The Defendant appeals his conviction for second-degree murder, aggravated battery, and robbery, and sentence of forty-five years’ imprisonment. He raises several issues on appeal and we affirm each without comment except for one.

We agree with the Defendant that the court erred when it considered a fact at sentencing that specifically conflicted with a factual finding by the jury. See, e.g., Baehren v. State, 43 Fla. L. Weekly D136 (Fla. 4th DCA Jan. 10, 2018); Guerra v. State, 212 So. 3d 541, 542 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017). While orally pronouncing the sentence, the court stated that the Defendant “pulled out a firearm”; that he was “brandishing a firearm”; and, again, that he “pulled out firearms.” Yet as counsel for the Defendant noted at the hearing and again argues on appeal, the verdict form specifically asked if “the Defendant actually possess[ed] a firearm,” and the jury answered “no.”

Further, the convictions on other charges do not explain the court’s statements. Contra Howard v. State, 820 So. 2d 337, 340 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). Here, the jury specifically found the Defendant did not possess a firearm making it impossible to reconcile the court’s statements at sentencing with the jury’s verdict.

Because of the court’s consideration of a fact at sentencing that specifically conflicts with the jury’s verdict, we vacate the Defendant’s sentence and remand the case for resentencing before a different circuit judge. The Defendant’s conviction is otherwise affirmed.

Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded for resentencing. GERBER, C.J., and GROSS, J., concur. * * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw