RICHARDSON
v.
STATE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Appellant Richardson is affirmed and directed to show cause why he should not be prohibited from filing further pro se appeals and pleadings relating to the underlying case.
[1] A court may direct a pro se litigant to show cause why he should not be prohibited from filing further pleadings when his pattern of repeated filings constitutes an abuse…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceWilliam Charles Richardson filed repeated appeals, petitions, and motions in the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County concerning case F75-11762, genera…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Sanctions For Abuse Of Process cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed February 21, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D17-2436 Lower Tribunal No. 75-11762B
________________
William Charles Richardson,
Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida,
Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Stephen T. Millan, Judge.
William Charles Richardson, in proper person.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SALTER, EMAS and FERNANDEZ, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. The Appellant, William Charles Richardson, is directed to show cause, within thirty days of the date of this opinion, why he should not be prohibited from filing further pro se appeals, petitions, motions, or other pleadings in this Court relating to lower tribunal case F75-11762. See State v. Spencer, 751
So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999), and the trial court’s orders of October 13, 2017, June 24,
2016, September 24, 2015, and April 12, 2013, as well as this Court’s opinions and orders in Case Nos. 3D17-2051, 3D16-2162, 3D16-1825, 3D15-1936, 3D15-530,
and 3D13-2045.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999)
- Moore v. State, 944 So. 2d 1069 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)
- Whipple v. State, 112 So. 3d 540 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)