TAVIONE ANTHONEY WILLIAMS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 1st DCA | 2018-11-30
No. 17-4978
257 So. 3d 1226 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2018) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A juvenile offender sentenced to a term of life imprisonment with a mandatory minimum of life is entitled to a judicial review hearing after twenty years to allow for the possibility of early release.


Headnotes

[1] A juvenile offender whose sentence exceeds twenty years is statutorily entitled to a judicial review hearing after twenty years to allow for the possibility of early rele…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“[A]ll juvenile offenders whose sentences meet the standard defined by the Legislature in chapter 2014-220, a sentence longer than twenty years, are entitled to judicial review.”

Citation to Kelsey v. State establishing the requirement for judicial review hearings

Facts & Procedural History

Tavione Anthoney Williams, age seventeen, committed attempted felony murder where he discharged a firearm causing great bodily harm, attempted robbery…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

775.082(3)(c); 921.1402(2)(d), Fla. Stat. (2015); see also Kelsey v. State, 206 So. 3d 5, 8 (Fla. 2016) (“[A]ll juvenile offenders whose sentences meet the standard defined by the Legislature in chapter 2014-220, a sentence longer than twenty years, are entitled to judicial review.”); see also, Dinnall v. State, 246 So. 3d 1302 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018); Montgomery v. State, 230 So. 3d 1256, 1263 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017). All other issues raised on appeal are affirmed without comment. AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED with instructions.

ROWE, OSTERHAUS, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Tavione Anthoney Williams v. State, 257 So. 3d 1226 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)
    …y v. State, 206 So. 3d 5, 8 (Fla. 2016) (“[A]ll juvenile offenders whose sentences meet the standard defined by the Legislature in chapter 2014-220, a sentence longer than twenty years, are entitled to judicial review.”); see also, Dinnall v. State, 246 So. 3d 1302 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018); Montgomery v. State, 230 So. 3d 1256, 1263 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017). All other issues raised on appeal are affirmed without comment. AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED with instructions. ROWE, OSTERHAUS, and KELSEY,…
  • Robinson v. State, 249 So. 3d 791 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
    …v. State , 206 So. 3d 5, 8 (Fla. 2016) ("[A]ll juvenile offenders whose sentences meet the standard defined by the Legislature in chapter 2014-220, a sentence longer than twenty years, are entitled to judicial review."); see also Dinnall v. State , 246 So. 3d 1302, 2018 WL 3312116 (Fla. 5th DCA July 6, 2018) ; Montgomery v. State , 230 So. 3d 1256, 1263 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) ; Burrows v. State , 219 So. 3d 910, 911 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017). AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; and REMANDED with instructions. TO…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw