CURRY
v.
STATE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Second District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower court's decision without providing specific reasoning. The per curiam opinion cites several prior Florida Supreme Court and District Court of Appeal cases, suggesting the appeal was decided based on established precedent.
The appellate court held that the lower court's decision was correct and should be affirmed.
“Affirmed.”
This is the court's ultimate decision on the appeal.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceVernal Curry appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County. The specific facts leading to the appeal are not detailed in this per…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Departure From Guidelines cases and more on FLexlaw
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
VERNAL CURRY, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-2597 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed January 4, 2019.
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Tom Barber, Judge. Vernal Curry, pro se.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Adaway v. State, 902 So. 2d 746 (Fla. 2005); Milks v. State, 894 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 2005); Bizzell v. State, 912 So. 2d 386 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Sheppard v. State, 907 So. 2d 1259 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Shaw v. State, 780 So. 2d 188 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Gibson v. State, 721 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Banaszak v. State, 579 So. 2d 867 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Johnson v. State, 917 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); Hannah v. State, 869 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Martell v. State, 676 So. 2d 1030 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).
CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited (11 total)
- Bizzell v. State, 912 So. 2d 386 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)
- Darrick Terrell Adaway v. State, 902 So. 2d 746 (Fla. 2005)
- Milks v. State, 894 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 2005)
- Gibson v. State, 721 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)
- Markin v. Markin, 917 So. 2d 1011 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)
- Shaw v. State, 780 So. 2d 188 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)
- Orestes Martell v. State, 676 So. 2d 1030 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)
- Clemons v. State, 907 So. 2d 1259 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)
- Hannah v. State, 869 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)
- Banaszak v. State, 579 So. 2d 867 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)