MARIE FLEURIMA
v.
IVONNE HARTING
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
When an appellant fails to provide a trial transcript and the statement of evidence is not approved by the trial court as required by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(5), appellate review is limited to errors appearing on the face of the final judgment.
[1] When an appellant fails to provide a trial transcript and the statement of evidence is not approved by the trial court as required by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“because no trial transcript was provided to the appellate court and the provided statement of the evidence was not approved by the trial court as required by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(5), 'our review is limited to those errors that may appear on the face of the final judgment'”
The court explained the basis for limiting appellate review
Marie Fleurima appealed a circuit court judgment in Broward County. The appellant did not provide a trial transcript to the appellate court and did no…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
MARIE FLEURIMA, Appellant,
V.
IVONNE HARTING, Appellee.
No. 4D2025-2419
[April 29, 2026]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael A. Robinson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 062022CA010386AXXXCE.
Marie Fleurima, Sunrise, pro se.
No appearance for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Edman v. Edman, 407 So. 3d 452, 454–55 (Fla. 4th DCA 2025) (because no trial transcript was provided to the appellate court and the provided statement of the evidence was not approved by the trial court as required by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(5), “our review is limited to those errors that may appear on the face of the final judgment").
KUNTZ, C.J., MAY and FORST, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fleurima v. Harting (Fla. 4th DCA 2026)
Authorities Cited
- Fleurima v. Harting (Fla. 4th DCA 2026)