CURTIS RYAN
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's judgment was affirmed based on controlling precedent in Smith v. State.
Curtis Ryan appealed a judgment from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County. The specific facts underlying the judgment are not detailed in this opin…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed May 13, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 3D25-0673 Lower Tribunal No. F22-11326
Curtis Ryan, Appellant,
vs.
State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Christine Hernandez, Judge.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Manuel Alvarez, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Lourdes B. Fernandez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, GORDO and GOODEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Smith v. State, 411 So. 3d 487 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025), reh'g denied (May 15, 2025), review denied, No. SC2025-0851, 2026 WL 659258 (Fla. Mar. 9, 2026).
2
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ryan v. State (Fla. 3d DCA 2026)
Authorities Cited
- Ryan v. State (Fla. 3d DCA 2026)