CARL L. MULLINGS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Orders denying motions to correct, reduce, or modify a sentence are not appealable.
[1] An order denying a motion to correct, reduce, or modify a sentence is not appealable under Florida law.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“As an order denying a motion to correct, reduce, or modify a sentence is not appealable, we dismiss the appeal.”
Court's statement of the controlling legal principle and disposition
Mullings was convicted in 1982 of multiple counts of armed robbery and sentenced to five consecutive 134-year terms. He filed a motion for 'special co…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Consecutive Sentences cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed May 13, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 3D26-0197 Lower Tribunal Nos. F81-28823 & F81-29402
Carl L. Mullings, Appellant,
VS.
State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Carlos H. Gamez, Judge.
Carl L. Mullings, in proper person.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Camilo Montoya, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCALES, C.J., and GORDO and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Carl L. Mullings, was convicted in 1982 of multiple counts of armed robbery and sentenced to five consecutive 134-year terms. Mullings challenges the trial court's order denying his motion for “special consideration” seeking to terminate or modify his sentence to time served to enable his release for deportation. “As an order denying a motion to correct, reduce, or modify a sentence is not appealable, we dismiss the appeal." Gonzalez-Marham v. State, 346 So. 3d 684 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (citing Adams v. State, 487 So. 2d 1209, 1209 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)); see also Baker v. State, 746 So. 2d 469, 469 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); Hernandez v. State, 62 So. 3d 1158, 1158 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(1)).
Dismissed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Mullings v. State (Fla. 3d DCA 2026)
Authorities Cited
- Adams v. State, 487 So. 2d 1209 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
- Baker v. State, 746 So. 2d 469 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)
- Mullings v. State (Fla. 3d DCA 2026)