WILLIAM SIMS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A trial court properly denies a motion to compel directed at the Office of the Public Defender when the Public Defender responds that it does not possess the requested documents.
[1] An indigent defendant is entitled to transcripts and record documents prepared at public expense without charge for copying, and when the Public Defender claims it does n…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Transcripts or record documents that were prepared at public expense on behalf of an indigent defendant must be provided to the defendant without charge for copying.”
Footnote 1, citing Brown v. State, 93 So. 3d 1194, 1196 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012), establishing the right to transcripts prepared at public expense.
William Sims, proceeding pro se, sought to compel the Office of the Public Defender to provide the record on appeal, including trial and deposition tr…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion To Compel Discovery cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed May 21, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D25-0228 Lower Tribunal No. F95-33413 ________________
William Sims, Appellant,
vs.
State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Richard Hersch, Judge.
William Sims, in proper person.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General and Magaly Rodriguez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before LOGUE, C.J., and GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.
GORDO, J.
2 William Sims (“Sims”), pro se, appeals the trial court’s January 21, 2025, order denying his motion to compel the Office of the Public Defender to provide him with the record on appeal, including all trial and deposition transcripts related to the direct appeal of his 1995 felony case. The trial court denied Sims’ motion to compel, referencing a response from the Office of the Public Defender that it was not in possession of the requested documents. Because the response from the Office of the Public Defender refuted Sims’ allegation that it possessed the documents which Sims is entitled to have,1 the trial court was within its authority to deny the motion. We therefore affirm without prejudice to Sims seeking to obtain the requested documents from other agencies that may possess them, i.e., the clerk’s office or the State Attorney’s Office. See Brown v. State, 152 So. 3d 739, 741 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (“We reverse because the response of the Office of the Public Defender did not refute Brown’s allegation that his attorneys possessed the documents . . . As it stands, this is not a case where there is no contested issue of fact. On remand, if the Office of the Public Defender produces evidence that it does not in fact possess the documents which Brown is
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Marcelo A. Gamarra v. State, 93 So. 3d 1194 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)
- Brown v. State, 152 So. 3d 739 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)