200 E FLAGLER DEVELOPMENT LLC
v.
FFD INC., ETC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A third-party beneficiary breach of contract claim must allege that the contracting parties had a clear or manifest intent to primarily and directly benefit the third party, and dismissal is proper when the complaint and attached contract negate this element.
[1] To state a claim for third-party beneficiary breach of contract, a plaintiff must allege that the contracting parties had a clear or manifest intent to primarily and dire…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“To adequately plead this cause of action, a plaintiff must allege '1) the existence of a contract, 2) the clear or manifest intent of the contracting parties that the contract primarily and directly benefit the third party, 3) breach of the contract by a contracting party, and 4) damages to the third-party resulting from the breach.'”
Statement of the legal standard for pleading a third-party beneficiary breach of contract claim
200 E Flagler Development, LLC appealed from dismissal of its third-party beneficiary breach of contract claim against FFD Inc. d/b/a Tai Architecture…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Failure To State A Claim cases and more on FLexlaw
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed June 11, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D24-2272 Lower Tribunal No. 24-10944-CA-01 ________________
200 E Flagler Development, LLC, Appellant,
vs.
FFD Inc., etc., Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Pedro P. Echarte, Jr., Judge.
ALGO Law Firm, LLP, Gavin L. Sinclair, and Ignacio M. Alvarez, for appellant.
Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP, Robert Malani, and Robin Taylor Symons, for appellee.
Before LINDSEY, MILLER, and GOODEN, JJ.
MILLER, J.
2 Appellant, 200 E Flagler Development, LLC, appeals from a final order dismissing its third-party beneficiary breach of contract claim against appellee, FFD, Inc. d/b/a Tai Architecture & Design, Inc., for failure to state a claim. To adequately plead this cause of action, a plaintiff must allege “1) the existence of a contract, 2) the clear or manifest intent of the contracting parties that the contract primarily and directly benefit the third party,3) breach of the contract by a contracting party, and 4) damages to the thirdparty resulting from the breach.” Ahmed v. Hamilton Ins. DAC, No. 3D23- 1483, 2025 WL 1119168, at *2 (Fla. 3d DCA Apr. 16, 2025) (quoting Biscayne Inv. Grp., Ltd. v. Guarantee Mgmt. Servs., Inc., 903 So. 2d 251, 254 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)). Here, the operative complaint did not assert that the contracting parties intended to primarily and directly benefit appellant, and the contract attached to the complaint negated any express contractual basis for the claim. See Buck v. Kent Sec. of Broward, Inc., 638 So. 2d 1004, 1004 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) (holding lease attached to complaint negated thirdparty beneficiary allegation); Found. Health v. Westside EKG Assocs., 944 So. 2d 188, 194–95 (Fla. 2006) (noting plaintiff must demonstrate the contracting parties had “the clear or manifest intent” to “primarily and directly benefit the third party”); Fla. Int’l Univ. Bd. of Trs. v. Signal Safe, Inc., 388 So. 3d 1103, 1107 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024) (“[T]hird-party beneficiary status is
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Brown v. State, 903 So. 2d 251 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)
- Buck v. Kent Sec. OF Broward, Inc., 638 So. 2d 1004 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)
- Helmick v. Taylor, 386 So. 3d 243 (Fla. 2d DCA 2024)