MARK JONES
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Fla. 6th DCA | 2025-08-01
No. 2023-4334
Gentile, J., Nardella, J., Mize, J., White, J.
2025 FL 6716 Florida District Court of Appeal, Sixth District (2025)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Holding

A prisoner's petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging close management confinement must be filed in the circuit court of the county in which the prisoner is detained, not transferred to the county where the state agency maintains its headquarters.

Headnotes

[1] A petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging a prisoner's assignment to close management confinement must be filed in the circuit court of the county in which the pri…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence
Key Quotes

“If a prisoner files a habeas corpus petition in circuit court, the petition must be filed in the circuit court of the county in which the prisoner is detained.”

Citation to Alachua Reg'l Juv. Det. Ctr. v. T.O., 684 So. 2d 814, 816 (Fla. 1996), establishing the venue rule for habeas corpus petitions.
Facts & Procedural History

Mark Jones, incarcerated in Charlotte County, was placed in Close Management II housing following a disciplinary infraction and remained there after a…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Topics
Petition For Writ Of Mandamus Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus Habeas Corpus

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Petition For Writ Of Mandamus cases and more on FLexlaw

Per_curiam
Per Curiam

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D2023-4334 Lower Tribunal No. 23-4243CA _____________________________

MARK JONES, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee. _____________________________

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County. Geoffrey H. Gentile, Judge.

August1, 2025

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Mark Jones (“Jones”), appeals the lower court’s order converting his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus into a Petition for Writ of Mandamus and transferring the petition from Charlotte County to Leon County. While incarcerated in Charlotte County, Jones was transferred to the “Close Management II” housing classification following a disciplinary infraction and he remained there following a

2

six-month review.1 Jones filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus challenging his continued detention in Close Management II, which the trial court converted into a Petition for Writ of Mandamus. The trial court transferred the petition to Leon County on the ground that the proper venue for filing a petition for writ of mandamus against a state agency is the county in which the agency maintains its headquarters. Jones properly filed his petition as a petition for writ of habeas corpus in Charlotte County. See Banks v. Jones, 232 So. 3d 963, 966 (Fla. 2017) (holding that a petition for writ of habeas corpus is the correct mechanism for a prisoner to seek release from close management); Jones v. Dep’t of Corr., 399 So. 3d 399, 399 (Fla. 6th DCA 2025) (applying Banks to a petition challenging assignment to Close Management II); Alachua Reg’l Juv. Det. Ctr. v. T.O., 684 So. 2d 814, 816 (Fla. 1996) (“If a prisoner files a habeas corpus petition in circuit court, the petition must be filed in the circuit court of the county in which the prisoner is detained.”).

3

Accordingly, we reverse the transfer order and remand for Jones’s petition to be addressed by the circuit court in Charlotte County.2 REVERSED and REMANDED. NARDELLA and MIZE, JJ., concur. WHITE, J., dissents, without opinion.

Mark Jones, Perry, pro se.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lydon Schultz, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED

Footnotes
1 Close management is “the separation of an inmate apart from the general population, for reasons of security or the order and effective management of the institution, where the inmate, through his or her behavior, has demonstrated an inability to live in the general population without abusing the rights and privileges of others.” Fla. Admin. Code R. 33–601.800(1)(a). Inmates in close management are reviewed “at least once every six months or as often as necessary to determine if continuation, modification, or removal from [close management] status is appropriate.” Fla. Admin. Code R. 33-601.800(16)(e).
2 During the pendency of this appeal, Jones was transferred to a correctional institution in Taylor County. Whether a prisoner’s transfer to a facility in a different county during the pendency of an already-filed petition for writ of habeas corpus requires the petition to be dismissed or transferred to the new county is an issue which the trial court has not yet addressed and on which the district courts of appeal have disagreed. Compare Owens v. Dep’t of Corr., 283 So. 3d 440 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) and Williams v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 760 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), with Perkins v. State, 766 So. 2d 1173, 1175 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). Since the trial court has not transferred the petition to the county in which Jones now resides and that issue is not presented in this appeal, we do not address it. The trial court may address this issue, if appropriate, in the proceedings below after entry of the mandate in this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw