ANDREW PANZO
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
ANDREW PANZO
STATE OF FLORIDA
242 So. 3d 353
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2018)
Per_curiam
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
ANDREW PANZO, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3406 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed January 31, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, Judge. Andrew Panzo, pro se.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.801(b); Stovall v. Cooper, 860 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (en banc); Stokes v. State, 851 So. 2d 788 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Brown v. State, 793 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Brito v. State, 194 So. 3d 522 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016). SILBERMAN, KELLY, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Stovall v. Sergeant William Cooper, 860 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)
- Brown v. State, 793 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)
- Stokes v. State, 851 So. 2d 788 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)
- Yearby v. State, 194 So. 3d 522 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)