RICHARD H. ELBERT, JR.
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 2d DCA | 2019-02-20
No. 18-2417
269 So. 3d 543 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2019)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The trial court's judgment was properly entered under Florida's habitual offender statute, section 775.084, and affirmed without discussion of the specific contentions.


Headnotes

[1] Florida Statute § 775.084(1)(d), (3)(c)(5) governs sentencing provisions that courts must apply in criminal cases.

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Richard H. Elbert, Jr. appealed from a judgment entered by the Circuit Court for Pinellas County. The specific underlying facts and charges are not de…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge. Richard H. Elbert, Jr., pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 775.084(1)(d), (3)(c)(5), Fla. Stat. (2010); Elbert v. State, 239 So. 3d 38 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) (table decision); Lindquist v. State, 155 So. 3d 1193 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014); Bryant v. State, 47 So. 3d 952 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010); Bizzell v. State, 912 So. 2d 386 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Caldwell v. State, 125 So. 3d 1018 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013); Walden v. State, 112 So. 3d 578 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). KELLY, MORRIS, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw