DANIELLE A. EVANS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The judgment and sentence are affirmed, but the case is remanded for the trial court to correct the scrivener's error in the judgment and order of probation that misidentified the offense charged and convicted.
[1] A scrivener's error in a judgment and order of probation that misidentifies the offense charged and convicted may be corrected on remand to the trial court, even after th…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceDanielle A. Evans was convicted of aggravated fleeing or attempting to elude a law enforcement officer causing injury or damage. The judgment and orde…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Rule Of Criminal Procedure 3.800(B)(2) Motion To Correct Sentencing Error cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
DANIELLE A. EVANS,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D18-993
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed November 2, 2018
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Lisa T. Munyon, Judge.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Edward J. Weiss, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence but remand for correction of a scrivener’s error in the judgment and order of probation. Danielle A. Evans filed a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2) motion to correct a sentencing error, noting that count IV of the judgment and order of probation reflects that she was charged
2
and convicted of fleeing to elude a law enforcement officer at high speed or with wanton disregard when she was actually charged and convicted of aggravated fleeing or attempting to elude a law enforcement officer causing injury or damage. The trial court granted the motion and directed the clerk of court to reflect the correct offense in count IV of the judgment and order of probation. However, the corrected documents continue to reflect the scrivener’s error. We remand with directions to the trial court to correct the judgment and order of probation. See King v. State, 201 So. 3d 206 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) (affirming Anders appeal but remanding for correction of scrivener’s error). AFFIRMED and REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s errors. ORFINGER, EVANDER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rodriguez v. State (Fla. 5th DCA 2022)
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Rashuan Devon King v. State, 201 So. 3d 206 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)
- Taleasha Daniele McTEAR v. State, 201 So. 3d 206 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)