MARYANN HOUDE RODRIGUEZ
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
An appellate court must remand for correction of a probation order when it contains scrivener's errors that do not reflect the trial court's pronouncement.
[1] A probation order containing scrivener's errors that do not reflect the trial court's pronouncement must be remanded for correction to align the written order with the co…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceMaryann Houde Rodriguez was convicted and sentenced to probation in Marion County Circuit Court. The probation order contained discrepancies with the …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Drug Offender Probation cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
MARYANN HOUDE RODRIGUEZ,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D21-409 LT Case No. 2020-CF-002093-A-X
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed March 18, 2022
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County, Lisa D. Herndon, Judge.
Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Joseph Chloupek, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Whitney Brown Hartless, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
2
WALLIS, J.
In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm Appellant's judgment and sentence, but we remand for an amended order of probation which strikes drug offender probation and reflects the trial court's pronouncement of probation. See Evans v. State, 257 So. 3d 155 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018) (citing King v. State, 201 So. 3d 206 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)). AFFIRMED and REMANDED for correction of scrivener's errors.
EISNAUGLE and NARDELLA, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Evans v. State, 257 So. 3d 155 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)