VICTOR WILLIAMS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A probation condition prohibiting any contact with minors is overbroad and must be modified to prohibit only intentional contact with minors without court approval.
[1] A probation condition prohibiting any contact with minors is overbroad because it subjects offenders to possible punishment for innocent or inadvertent conduct and must b…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceVictor Williams was convicted of unlawful sexual activity with a minor and sentenced to eight years in prison followed by five years' probation. The p…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Unlawful Sexual Activity With A Minor cases and more on FLexlaw
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
VICTOR WILLIAMS,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D20-229
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed October 9, 2020
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Flagler County, Terence R. Perkins, Judge.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Phillip H. Arroyo, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison
L.
Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
EVANDER, C.J.,
Victor Williams was convicted of having unlawful sexual activity with a minor.1 He was sentenced to eight years in prison followed by five years’ probation. The probation order included a special condition prohibiting Williams from having contact with a child
2 under the age of eighteen (subject to certain exceptions not applicable to this appeal). Williams challenged the imposition of this condition in a motion to correct sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2). In his motion, Williams argued that this condition of probation was overbroad. The trial court denied the motion. Williams raises one issue on appeal, contending that the trial court erred in denying his motion. We agree.
This court has previously held that probation conditions forbidding any contact with minors are overly broad because they subject offenders to possible punishment for innocent or inadvertent conduct. See Stapler v. State, 190 So. 3d 162, 165 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016); Lamerton v. State, 78 So. 3d 686, 686 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012); Rowles v. State, 682 So. 2d 1184–85 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Graham v. State, 658 So. 2d 642, 643 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). On remand, the trial court should modify this condition of probation to prohibit only intentional contact with minors without court approval. See Stapler, 190 So. 3d at 165.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
WALLIS and TRAVER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Matos v. Budget Rent A CAR Sys., Inc., 658 So. 2d 642 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
- Stapler v. State, 190 So. 3d 162 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016)
- Lamerton v. State, 78 So. 3d 686 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012)