MARSHALL RUNAE PORTER
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 2d DCA | 2011-02-09
No. 18-3289
185 So. 3d 1245 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2011) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 163 So. 3d 1199 · 126 So. 3d 1063 · 54 So. 3d 982
Cited by 16 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The trial court's judgment is affirmed.


Facts & Procedural History

Marshall Runae Porter appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County. The opinion does not provide detailed facts.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, Judge. PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Porter v. State, 185 So. 3d 1245 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (table decision); Porter v. State, 163 So. 3d 1199 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (table decision); Porter v. State, 126 So. 3d 1063 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (table decision); Porter v. State, 63 So. 3d 766 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (table decision); Porter v. State, 54 So. 3d 982 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (table decision).

SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Porter v. State, 185 So. 3d 1245 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)
  • Renato R. Remak, Jr. v. State, 142 So. 3d 3 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)
    …he trial court sentenced Mr. Remak to a term of twenty-five years’ imprisonment for the first count and a consecutive term of twenty years’ imprisonment for the second count. This court affirmed Mr. Remak’s convictions and sentences. Remak v. State, 54 So. 3d 982 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (table decision). In ground nine of his motion, Mr. Remak contended that his trial attorneys were ineffective for not adopting his pro se demands for speedy trial and for waiving his right to a speedy trial. Mr. Remak alleged tha…
  • Porter v. State, 265 So. 3d 611 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019)

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw