ROBERT L. FOX, SR.
v.
TIMEPAYMENT CORP. AND ICE GLASS PRINTS FLORIDA, LLC N/K/A DIAMOND ICE PRINTS, LLC
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A change in the applicable rule of law resulting from a later appellate decision in an unrelated case is not grounds to vacate a final order under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b).
[1] A change in the applicable rule of law resulting from a later appellate decision in an unrelated case does not constitute grounds to vacate a final order under Florida Ru…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“A change in the applicable rule of law resulting from a later appellate decision in an unrelated case is not a ground [under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b)] to vacate a final order.”
Court's statement of controlling legal principle from Petrysian v. Metro. Gen. Ins.
Robert L. Fox, Sr. appealed a judgment involving Timepayment Corp. and Ice Glass Prints Florida, LLC. The appellant sought to vacate the final order b…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
ROBERT L. FOX, SR., Case No. 5D20-2143 Appellant, v.
TIMEPAYMENT CORP. AND
ICE GLASS PRINTS FLORIDA, LLC N/K/A DIAMOND ICE PRINTS, LLC, Appellees. ________________________________/ Opinion filed May 25, 2021 Nonfinal Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Lisa T. Munyon, Judge. John J. Bennett, of Nardella & Nardella, PLLC, Orlando, for Appellant. Ralph S. Marcadis, of Marcadis Singer, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee Timepayment Corporation. No Appearance for Other Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
2 AFFIRMED. See Petrysian v. Metro. Gen. Ins., 672 So. 2d 562, 563 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996) (“A change in the applicable rule of law resulting from a later appellate decision in an unrelated case is not a ground [under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b)] to vacate a final order.” (citing Theisen v. Old Republic Ins., 468 So. 2d 434, 435 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985))); Williams v. Skylink Jets, Inc., 229 So. 3d 1275, 1279 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) (recognizing that a final judgment rendered without notice to the defaulting party remains valid as to any claim for liquidated damages). COHEN, LAMBERT and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Williams v. Skylink Jets, Inc., 229 So. 3d 1275 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017)
- Theisen v. OLD Republic Ins. Co., 468 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985)
- Petrysian v. Metro. Gen. Ins. Co., 672 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)