SANDERS JR.
v.
STATE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A prisoner may be prohibited from filing further pro se pleadings related to a specific criminal case when he fails to demonstrate good cause in response to an order to show cause.
[1] A court may prohibit a pro se litigant from filing further appeals and related pleadings in a specific case when the litigant fails to demonstrate good cause in response…
[2] Violation of a pro se filing prohibition may subject a prisoner to sanctions, including written findings forwarded to the Department of Corrections for potential discipli…
Previewing 2 of 2 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceSanders filed a rule 3.800 motion seeking to correct an allegedly illegal sentence, which the trial court denied. The appellate court issued an order …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Sentence Enhancement cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
On March 13, 2019, this Court issued an opinion affirming the trial court's denial of appellant John Edward Sanders Jr.'s rule 3.800 motion that sought to correct an allegedly illegal sentence. Our opinion contained an order to show cause why Sanders should not be prohibited from filing with this Court any further pro se appeals, petitions, motions or other proceedings related to his criminal sentence in circuit court case number F95-6485.
Sanders responded to the order to show cause on April 15, 2019. Sanders's response raises no new information or argument for our consideration. Accordingly, we conclude that Sanders has not shown good cause to justify further pro se filings of appeals, petitions, motions, or other proceedings with this Court.
It is hereby ordered that the Clerk of the Court of the Third District Court of Appeal shall refuse further filings related to case number F95-6485; provided, however, that filings related to case number F95-6485 may be accepted by the Clerk if such filings have been reviewed and signed by an attorney who is a licensed member of the Florida Bar in good standing.
Any further and unauthorized pro se filings by Sanders will subject him to sanctions, including the issuance of written findings forwarded to the Florida Department of Corrections for consideration by it for disciplinary action, pursuant to section 944.279(1) of the Florida Statutes.
Order issued.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sanders Jr. v. State, 275 So. 3d 682 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019)…ith an assault, (ii) robbery, and (iii) grand theft. The trial court sentenced Sanders as an habitual violent felony offender, pursuant to section 775.084(b) of the Florida Statutes (1995).1 This Court affirmed his conviction in Sanders v. State, 697 So. 2d 856 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (table). In 1995, the trial court based Sanders’s habitual violent felony offender status on his conviction in lower tribunal case number F91-45810, in which Sanders pled no contest to three counts of armed robbery and was sente…
Authorities Cited
- Sanders Jr. v. State, 275 So. 3d 682 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019)