ERIC DAMON GORDON
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Second District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower court's decision without providing specific reasoning, citing several Florida statutes and case precedents. The appellate court's per curiam affirmance indicates agreement with the trial court's ruling.
The appellate court held that the lower court's decision was correct and affirmed it.
[1] Section 775.082(1), Florida Statutes, governs the imposition of criminal sentences in accordance with the sentencing guidelines.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Affirmed.”
This is the court's direct ruling on the appeal.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe case involves an appeal by Eric Damon Gordon against the State of Florida. The specific facts leading to the appeal are not detailed in this per c…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Sentencing Statutes cases and more on FLexlaw
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
ERIC DAMON GORDON, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-4699 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed June 19, 2019.
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Joseph A. Bulone, Judge. PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See § 775.082(1), Fla. Stat. (2002); England v. State, 940 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 2006); Williams v. State, 707 So. 2d 683 (Fla. 1998); Shortridge v. State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Dorsett v. State, 166 So. 3d 898 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015); Shivers v. State, 96 So. 3d 1039 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); Atwater v. State, 781 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). SILBERMAN, BLACK, and SMITH,JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Shortridge v. State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)
- England v. State, 940 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 2006)
- Williams v. State, 707 So. 2d 683 (Fla. 1998)
- Potter v. State, 781 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)
- Alphonso Shivers v. State, 96 So. 3d 1039 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)
- Atwater v. State, 781 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
- Francisco v. State, 166 So. 3d 898 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)
- Dorsett v. State, 166 So. 3d 898 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)
- Ives Renna v. State, 96 So. 3d 1039 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)