GARY MC CLOUD
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This case involved an appeal by Gary McCloud against the State of Florida. The appellate court affirmed the lower court's decision without providing specific details of the case, citing numerous prior Florida Supreme Court and District Court of Appeal rulings.
The appellate court affirmed the decision of the lower court.
“Affirmed.”
This is the court's ultimate decision on the appeal.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe opinion does not provide specific facts of the case. It is a per curiam affirmance, meaning the court affirmed the lower court's decision without …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Precedent cases and more on FLexlaw
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
GARY McCLOUD, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-884 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed October 16, 2019.
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge. PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Carbajal v. State, 75 So. 3d 258 (Fla. 2011); Wright v. State, 911 So. 2d 81 (Fla. 2005); DuBoise v. State, 520 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 1988); State v. King, 426 So. 2d 12 (Fla. 1982); McDonald v. State, 133 So. 3d 530 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013); Smart v. State, 124 So. 3d 347 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013); Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Brown v. State, 827 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Desmond v. State, 576 So. 2d 743 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Budd v. State, 477 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Gary v. State, 5 So. 3d 713 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009); Jones v. State, 907 So. 2d 1256 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); McMillan v. State, 832 So. 2d 946 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Hart v. State, 761 So. 2d 334 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). KHOUZAM, C.J., and CASANUEVA and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited (13 total)
- Brown v. State, 827 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)
- McDONALD v. State, 133 So. 3d 530 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)
- State v. King, 426 So. 2d 12 (Fla. 1982)
- DuBOISE v. State, 520 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 1988)
- Carbajal v. State, 75 So. 3d 258 (Fla. 2011)
- McMILLAN v. State, 832 So. 2d 946 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)
- Desmond v. State, 576 So. 2d 743 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)
- Hart v. State, 761 So. 2d 334 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)
- Wright v. State, 911 So. 2d 81 (Fla. 2005)
- Budd v. State, 477 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)