STATE
v.
TYRONE RAHMINGS

Fla. 3d DCA | 2021-02-10
No. 19-1585
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2021) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Holding

A court lacks jurisdiction to review a trial court's order denying a request to withdraw a prior ruling mandating resentencing.

Headnotes

[1] An appellate court lacks jurisdiction to review a trial court's order denying a request to withdraw a prior appellate mandate requiring resentencing.

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence
Facts & Procedural History

The trial court issued a mandate requiring Tyrone Rahmings to be resentenced if he was determined to be a juvenile at the time he committed the offens…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Topics
Appellate Precedent Mandate Resentencing Jurisdiction

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appellate Precedent cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court

Opinion filed February 10, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

Nos. 3D19-1585, 3D19-1584 and 3D19-1583 Lower Tribunal Nos. 81-12733, 81-12617 and 81-8037A

________________

The State of Florida,

Appellant,

vs.

Tyrone Rahmings,

Appellee.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Veronica A. Diaz, Judge. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant. Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Jonathan Greenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee. Before EMAS, C.J., and SCALES and MILLER, JJ. PER CURIAM.

The State seeks to appeal the trial court’s June 13, 2019 “Order

Denying State’s Request to Deny Re-Sentencing.” In its underlying motion,

the State requested that the trial court withdraw its prior ruling that, pursuant

to this Court’s mandate,1 the trial court should resentence Tyrone Rhamings

at a future sentencing hearing.

Based on the authority of State v. Yero, No. 19-192, 2021 WL 115440

(Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 13, 2021), we lack jurisdiction to adjudicate the State’s

appeal of the trial court's June 13, 2019 order. We therefore dismiss the

appeal.2

Appeal dismissed.

Footnotes
1 See Rahmings v. State, 224 So. 3d 300 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (“Rahmings I”). In Rahmings I, this Court concluded that, if Rahmings were determined to be a juvenile at the time he committed the offenses, he was entitled to be resentenced based upon the then-applicable Florida Supreme Court precedent articulated in Atwell v. State, 197 So. 3d 1040 (Fla. 2016), overruled by Franklin v. State, 258 So. 3d 1239, 1241 (Fla. 2018). 2 A temporary panel of this Court denied Rahmings’s motion to dismiss the appeal. While the merits panel is not bound by that interlocutory ruling, State v. Bryant, 901 So. 2d 381, 382 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005), we note that the temporary panel did not have the benefit of this Court’s opinion in Yero.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • State v. Rahmings (Fla. 3d DCA 2021)
    …otion, the State requested that the trial court withdraw its prior ruling that, pursuant to this Court’s mandate,1 the trial court should resentence Tyrone Rhamings at a future sentencing hearing. Based on the authority of State v. Yero, No. 19-192, 2021 WL 115440 (Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 13, 2021), we lack jurisdiction to adjudicate the State’s appeal of the trial court's June 13, 2019 order. We therefore dismiss the appeal.2 Appeal dismissed. 1 See Rahmings v. State, 224 So. 3d 300 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (“Rahmings…
  • State v. Rahmings (Fla. 3d DCA 2021)
    …otion, the State requested that the trial court withdraw its prior ruling that, pursuant to this Court’s mandate,1 the trial court should resentence Tyrone Rhamings at a future sentencing hearing. Based on the authority of State v. Yero, No. 19-192, 2021 WL 115440 (Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 13, 2021), we lack jurisdiction to adjudicate the State’s appeal of the trial court's June 13, 2019 order. We therefore dismiss the appeal.2 Appeal dismissed. 1 See Rahmings v. State, 224 So. 3d 300 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (“Rahmings…
  • State v. Rahmings (Fla. 3d DCA 2021)
    …otion, the State requested that the trial court withdraw its prior ruling that, pursuant to this Court’s mandate,1 the trial court should resentence Tyrone Rhamings at a future sentencing hearing. Based on the authority of State v. Yero, No. 19-192, 2021 WL 115440 (Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 13, 2021), we lack jurisdiction to adjudicate the State’s appeal of the trial court's June 13, 2019 order. We therefore dismiss the appeal.2 Appeal dismissed. 1 See Rahmings v. State, 224 So. 3d 300 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (“Rahmings…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw