CHRISTIAN LOZANO
v.
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT AND DIANA LOZANO

Fla. 4th DCA | 2021-02-10
No. 20-0292
305 So. 3d 801 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2021) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Holding

An administrative child support order affirmed on appeal where the appellant's brief raises no issue of merit, with preservation of the appellant's rights to seek modification or a superseding order through statutory remedies.

Headnotes

[1] An administrative child support order may be affirmed on appeal without prejudice to the obligor's subsequent right to seek modification under section 409.2563(12), Flori…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence
Facts & Procedural History

Christian Lozano appealed pro se a final administrative child support support order rendered by the Department of Revenue.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Topics
Administrative Support Order Modification Of Support Orders Pro Se Appeal

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Administrative Support Order cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Christian Lozano, appeals pro se the final administrative support order rendered by the appellee, the Department of Revenue. The appellant’s brief does not raise any issue with merit. Thus, we affirm the support order without prejudice for the appellant to seek a modification of the final administrative support order as set forth in section 409.2563(12), Florida Statutes (2020), or a superseding order in the circuit court pursuant to section 409.2563(10)(c), Florida Statutes (2020). See Feliciano v. Dep’t of Revenue, Child Support Enf’t, 305 So. 3d 801, 803 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020).

Affirmed without prejudice. WARNER, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Lozano v. Dep't of Revenue, 305 So. 3d 801 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021)
    …istrative support order as set forth in section 409.2563(12), Florida Statutes (2020), or a superseding order in the circuit court pursuant to section 409.2563(10)(c), Florida Statutes (2020). See Feliciano v. Dep’t of Revenue, Child Support Enf’t, 305 So. 3d 801, 803 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020). Affirmed without prejudice. WARNER, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.…
  • Detric I. Barrett v. State of Fla. Dep't of Revenue (Fla. 3d DCA 2026)
    …ng that "[b]y waiving his right to a hearing, Appellant waived his ability to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the Department's determination of his child support obligations"); Feliciano v. Dep't of Revenue, Child Support Enf't, 305 So. 3d 801, 803 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020) (“Appellant's arguments on appeal are arguments that should have been presented and analyzed at a hearing."); see also City of Lake Wales v. Pub. Emp. Relations Comm’n, 402 So. 2d 1224, 1224-25 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981) (affirming…
  • Bradley v. Dep't of Revenue (Fla. 6th DCA 2026)

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw