SARAH BLYTH
v.
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A prevailing defendant in a foreclosure action is entitled to attorney's fees under section 57.105(7), Florida Statutes, when the mortgage contains an attorney's fees provision, even if the lender was not assigned the note, provided the parties are not strangers to the contract.
[1] A contract provision allowing attorney's fees to a party required to take action to enforce the contract supports a reciprocal award of prevailing party attorney's fees u…
[2] For reciprocal attorney's fees under section 57.105(7), Florida Statutes, the plaintiff and defendant must not be strangers to the contract.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“the statutory language [of section 57.105(7)] also requires that the plaintiff and defendant not be strangers to the contract.”
Discussion of the requirements under section 57.105(7) for awarding reciprocal attorney's fees
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC filed a foreclosure action against Sarah Blyth and Joseph Guaracino based on a mortgage and note. The homeowners prevailed b…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Assignment Of Note And Mortgage cases and more on FLexlaw
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
SARAH BLYTH and JOSEPH GUARACINO,
Appellants,
v.
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC,
Appellee.
No. 4D20-537
[August 18, 2021]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Dennis D. Bailey, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 14- 6149(11).
F. Scott Fistel of the Fistel Law Group, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.
Adam G. Schwartz of Fox McCluskey Bush Robison PLLC, Stuart, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellants challenge the trial court’s order denying their entitlement to attorney’s fees after they prevailed in appellee’s foreclosure action against them on the grounds that appellee did not have standing to foreclose under the mortgage and note. We reverse on the authority of Page v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas, 308 So. 3d 953 (Fla. 2020).
In Page, the court construed section 57.105(7), Florida Statutes (2019), which allows for a reciprocal award of prevailing party attorney’s fees. The statute requires in the first clause “the existence of ‘a contract [that] contains a provision allowing attorney’s fees to a party when he or she is required to take any action to enforce the contract.’” Id. at 959 (citing § 57.105(7), Fla. Stat.). And “the statutory language [of section 57.105(7)] also requires that the plaintiff and defendant not be strangers to the contract.” Id. The statute requires in the second clause that the party must prevail. Id.
2
Here, the mortgage and note upon which appellee filed suit to foreclose contained an attorney’s fees provision. Appellants prevailed in the action when appellee, who obtained its position by assignment, failed to prove standing.
Moreover, the parties in this case are not strangers to the contract. While appellee claims that it was not a party to the note, because it was never assigned the note, it sued on both the note and mortgage and represented in its complaint that it was entitled to enforce the note and held the note. It also sought to establish a lost note, stating that it had acquired the note. Both the note and mortgage contained an attorney’s fee provision. Even if appellee had not been assigned the note, appellants would still be entitled to fees under section 57.105(7), because of the fee provision in the mortgage. See Madl v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 244 So. 3d 1134 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017), and Harris v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, 311 So. 3d 66 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018), approved in Page, 308 So. 2d at 961. Pursuant to Page, appellants are entitled to their prevailing party attorney’s fees.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings. CONNER, C.J., WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.
* * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (29 total)
-
Gartner v. Reverse Mortg. Solutions, Inc., 308 So. 3d 942 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021)…, the Third District just issued its opinion in Castellanos v. Reverse Mortgage Funding LLC, No. 3D20-472, 2021 WL 1897069 (Fla. 3d DCA May 12, 2021), in which it applied the supreme court’s decision in Page v. Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, 308 So. 3d 953 (Fla. 2020)—decided on the same day as Ham—to facts distinctly analogous to our own, and, in doing so, determined that Page overruled Suchman. We now hold that the intervening decisions in Ham and Castellanos wholly inform the outcome in the presen…1 / 2
-
Blyth v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, 308 So. 3d 953 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021)…attorney’s fees after they prevailed in appellee’s foreclosure action against them on the grounds that appellee did not have standing to foreclose under the mortgage and note. We reverse on the authority of Page v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas, 308 So. 3d 953 (Fla. 2020). In Page, the court construed section 57.105(7), Florida Statutes (2019), which allows for a reciprocal award of prevailing party attorney’s fees. The statute requires in the first clause “the existence of ‘a contract [that] contains a…
-
State v. Crose, 378 So. 3d 1217 (Fla. 2d DCA 2024)…Justice Thomas has described as the 'one, cardinal canon [of construction] before all others'—that is, we 'presume that a legislature says in a statute what it means and means in a statute what it says there.' " Page v. Deutsche Bank Tr. Co. Ams., 308 So. 3d 953, 958 (Fla. 2020) (quoting Conn. Nat'l Bank v. Germain, 503 U.S. 249, 253-54 (1992)). The prior legislature had tied sex offender registration to a defendant's release from "the sanction imposed," not "a sanction" or 10 The State concedes that this…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 29 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Blyth v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, 308 So. 3d 953 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021)