TRAVIANCE POLITE
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A probation revocation order must be remanded for correction when a scrivener's error causes the trial court to state the wrong condition was violated, even though the underlying violation is properly established.
[1] A scrivener's error in a probation revocation order identifying an incorrect condition number requires remand for correction even where the trial court's factual findings…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceTraviance Polite's probation was revoked and terminated following a hearing where evidence established he possessed a firearm in violation of conditio…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Anders Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence imposed on Traviance Polite following the revocation and termination of his probation. We remand, however, for the correction of a scrivener’s error. The affidavit of violation alleged Polite violated condition 4 of his probation by possessing a firearm. Following a hearing, the trial court ruled Polite had possessed a firearm in violation of his probation but orally proclaimed that he violated condition 6. Polite’s sentence reflects multiple violations of condition 5. On remand, the trial court should correct its order revoking and terminating probation to reflect Polite violated condition 4. See Harrison v. State, 313 So. 3d 926, 926–27 (Fla. 5th DCA 2021) (remanding to correct scrivener’s error in revocation order to correctly reflect condition violated). AFFIRMED and REMANDED.
LAMBERT, C.J., TRAVER and NARDELLA, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Tecchio v. State (Fla. 5th DCA 2023)…s in the orders revoking probation to reflect that Appellant was found to have violated condition 5 in 2020-CF-4001 and condition 5 and special condition 2 in 2020- CF-4002. See Polite v. State, 339 So. 3d 486 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022); Harrison v. State, 313 So. 3d 926 (Fla. 5th DCA 2021). Neither order should reflect a violation of standard condition 2. AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF SCRIVENER’S ERROR. WALLIS, EDWARDS and HARRIS JJ., concur. 1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).…
-
Bergenty v. State (Fla. 5th DCA 2022)…t that Appellant was found to have violated Special Condition 28, not Special Condition 15, and for entry of an amended cost/fees order that shows the assessment of $50.00 (not $100.00) for the Public Defender Application Fee. See Harrison v. State, 313 So. 3d 926 (Fla. 5th DCA 2021). AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s error. EVANDER, EDWARDS, and HARRIS, JJ., concur. 1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).…
-
Tecchio v. State (Fla. 5th DCA 2023)…s in the orders revoking probation to reflect that Appellant was found to have violated condition 5 in 2020-CF-4001 and condition 5 and special condition 2 in 2020- CF-4002. See Polite v. State, 339 So. 3d 486 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022); Harrison v. State, 313 So. 3d 926 (Fla. 5th DCA 2021). Neither order should reflect a violation of standard condition 2. AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF SCRIVENER’S ERROR. WALLIS, EDWARDS and HARRIS JJ., concur. 1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)