LINDA COCHRAN TECCHIO
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Revocation of probation and accompanying sentences are affirmed, with remand for technical correction of the probation violation findings in the written orders.
[1] Probation revocation orders containing scrivener's errors identifying incorrect violated conditions must be remanded for correction, though the underlying revocation deci…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceTecchio had her probation revoked following criminal conduct. The trial court issued orders revoking probation in two cases (2020-CF-4001 and 2020-CF-…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Anders Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm the judgments and sentences imposed by the trial court following revocation of Appellant’s probation. However, we remand for correction of two scrivener’s errors in the orders revoking probation to reflect that Appellant was found to have violated condition 5 in 2020-CF-4001 and condition 5 and special condition 2 in 2020-CF-4002. See Polite v. State, 339 So. 3d 486 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022); Harrison v. State, 313 So. 3d 926 (Fla. 5th DCA 2021). Neither order should reflect a violation of standard condition 2.
AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF SCRIVENER’S ERROR.
WALLIS, EDWARDS and HARRIS JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Tecchio v. State (Fla. 5th DCA 2023)…ever, we remand for correction of two scrivener’s errors in the orders revoking probation to reflect that Appellant was found to have violated condition 5 in 2020-CF-4001 and condition 5 and special condition 2 in 2020- CF-4002. See Polite v. State, 339 So. 3d 486 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022); Harrison v. State, 313 So. 3d 926 (Fla. 5th DCA 2021). Neither order should reflect a violation of standard condition 2. AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF SCRIVENER’S ERROR. WALLIS, EDWARDS and HARRIS JJ., concur. 1 Anders v…
-
Tecchio v. State (Fla. 5th DCA 2023)…ever, we remand for correction of two scrivener’s errors in the orders revoking probation to reflect that Appellant was found to have violated condition 5 in 2020-CF-4001 and condition 5 and special condition 2 in 2020- CF-4002. See Polite v. State, 339 So. 3d 486 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022); Harrison v. State, 313 So. 3d 926 (Fla. 5th DCA 2021). Neither order should reflect a violation of standard condition 2. AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF SCRIVENER’S ERROR. WALLIS, EDWARDS and HARRIS JJ., concur. 1 Anders v…
-
Tecchio v. State (Fla. 5th DCA 2023)…ever, we remand for correction of two scrivener’s errors in the orders revoking probation to reflect that Appellant was found to have violated condition 5 in 2020-CF-4001 and condition 5 and special condition 2 in 2020- CF-4002. See Polite v. State, 339 So. 3d 486 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022); Harrison v. State, 313 So. 3d 926 (Fla. 5th DCA 2021). Neither order should reflect a violation of standard condition 2. AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF SCRIVENER’S ERROR. WALLIS, EDWARDS and HARRIS JJ., concur. 1 Anders v…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Traviance Polite v. State (Fla. 5th DCA 2022)
- Tecchio v. State (Fla. 5th DCA 2023)