HIRAM ANTONIO MALDONADO
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court's finding of probation violation is affirmed, but the judgment must be remanded for entry of an order that specifies the conditions of probation that were violated.
[1] In a probation violation proceeding, the trial court's written judgment or order must specify which conditions of probation or community control were violated, and failur…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“This court has consistently held that the trial judge must specify, in the written order or judgment, which conditions of probation or community control have been violated.”
Court discussing precedent requiring specificity in probation violation orders
Hiram Antonio Maldonado admitted to violating the terms of his probation. The trial court imposed judgment and sentence after the admission.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Violation Of Probation cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant appeals the judgment and sentence imposed by the trial court after Appellant admitted to violating his probation. We affirm the finding of violation but must remand because the trial court did not specify in its written order the conditions of probation Appellant was found to have violated. See Barkley v. State, 288 So. 3d 1272 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020) (affirming revocation; remanding for entry of proper order); Roberts v. State, 76 So. 3d 1047, 1048 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) (“This court has consistently held that the trial judge must specify, in the written order or judgment, which conditions of probation or community control have been violated.” (citing Bell v. State, 60 So. 3d 558 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011))).
Accordingly, we remand for entry of a proper adjudicatory order that lists the specific conditions of probation Appellant violated. AFFIRMED; REMANDED for entry of a proper order. COHEN, TRAVER and WOZNIAK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hiram Antonio Maldonado v. State, 288 So. 3d 1272 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022)…Appellant admitted to violating his probation. We affirm the finding of violation but must remand because the trial court did not specify in its written order the conditions of probation Appellant was found to have violated. See Barkley v. State, 288 So. 3d 1272 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020) (affirming revocation; remanding for entry of proper order); Roberts v. State, 76 So. 3d 1047, 1048 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) (“This court has consistently held that the trial judge must specify, in the written order or judgment, which…
Authorities Cited
- Bell v. State, 60 So. 3d 558 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011)
- Roberts v. State, 76 So. 3d 1047 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011)
- Hiram Antonio Maldonado v. State, 288 So. 3d 1272 (Fla. 5th DCA 2022)