RANDOLPH BAGGETT
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 3d DCA | 2023-05-03
No. 23-0129
King, J.
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2023) Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

Collateral estoppel prevents a defendant from relitigating issues previously presented and decided in successive post-conviction motions.


Headnotes

[1] Collateral estoppel bars a defendant from relitigating in successive post-conviction motions issues that have been previously presented and decided, although res judicata…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“although res judicata does not prevent a defendant from filing successive 3.800 motions raising new issues, collateral estoppel prevents a defendant from relitigating issues previously presented and decided”

Court's statement of applicable legal standard in State v. McBride

Facts & Procedural History

Randolph Baggett appealed a circuit court order regarding his successive motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, which addresses post-c…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Baggett v. Inch, 349 So. 3d 298 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021);

Baggett v. State, 271 So. 3d 1241 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019); Baggett v. State,

150 So. 3d 1151 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014); State v. McBride, 848 So. 2d 287, 290-91 (Fla. 2003) (holding that although res judicata does not prevent a defendant from filing successive 3.800 motions raising new issues, collateral estoppel prevents a defendant from relitigating issues previously presented and decided). See also Franklin v. State, 258 So. 3d 1239, 1241 (Fla. 2018) (acknowledging that in State v. Michel, 257 So. 3d 3 (Fla. 2018), the Florida

Supreme Court abrogated Atwell v. State, 197 So. 3d 1040 (Fla. 2016): “As we held in Michel, involving a juvenile homicide offender sentenced to life with the possibility of parole after 25 years, Florida's statutory parole process fulfills Graham's requirement that juveniles be given a “meaningful opportunity” to be considered for release during their natural life based upon

“normal parole factors,” [Virginia v.] LeBlanc, 137 S.Ct. [1726,] 1729 (2017),

as it includes initial and subsequent parole reviews based upon individualized considerations before the Florida Parole Commission that are subject to judicial review. . . .”)


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Baggett v. State (Fla. 3d DCA 2023)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Baggett v. Inch, 349 So. 3d 298 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021); Baggett v. State, 271 So. 3d 1241 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019); Baggett v. State, 150 So. 3d 1151 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014); State v. McBride, 848 So. 2d 287, 290- 91 (Fla. 2003) (holding that although res judicata does not prevent a defendant f…
    1 / 3
  • Baggett v. State (Fla. 3d DCA 2023)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Baggett v. Inch, 349 So. 3d 298 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021); Baggett v. State, 271 So. 3d 1241 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019); Baggett v. State, 150 So. 3d 1151 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014); State v. McBride, 848 So. 2d 287, 290- 91 (Fla. 2003) (holding that although res judicata does not prevent a defendant from filing successive 3.800 motions raising new issues, collateral estoppel prevents a defendant from relitig…
    1 / 3
  • Cassius Forte v. State (Fla. 3d DCA 2019)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Forte v. State, 271 So. 3d 1241 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw