ANTHONY ADAMS
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Both basic and incentive gain-time credits are subject to forfeiture by the Department of Corrections for unacceptable conduct pursuant to Florida Statutes section 944.28(1).
[1] Inmates receive a lump sum award of basic gain-time credits upon entering the prison system, and such earned credits are thereafter subject to forfeiture by the Departmen…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Both may be subject to forfeiture by the DOC pursuant to section 944.28(1), Florida Statutes”
Williams v. Wasi, regarding the distinction between basic and incentive gain-time
Anthony Adams appealed a circuit court decision regarding the forfeiture of gain-time credits while incarcerated. The case involves a challenge to the…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Incentive Gain Time cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Williams v. Wasi, 681 So. 2d 839, 840 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (“We find no merit in his distinction between basic gain-time and incentive gain-time, holding that both may be subject to forfeiture by the DOC pursuant to section 944.28(1), Florida Statutes (1995).”); Waldrup v. Dugger, 562 So. 2d 687, 689 (Fla. 1990) (noting a “basic gain-time award was subject to forfeiture for unacceptable conduct”); Singletary v. Jones, 681 So. 2d 836, 837 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (“[I]nmates receive a lump sum award of all basic gain time to which they may be entitled throughout the full term of their sentences upon entering the prison system. This gain time is earned when so credited, and is thereafter subject to earned gain time forfeiture.”).
2
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Waldrup v. Dugger, 562 So. 2d 687 (Fla. 1990)
- Singletary v. Jones, 681 So. 2d 836 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)
- Williams v. Wasi, 681 So. 2d 839 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)