ALTAMAR 1, LLC
v.
ADALGISA NOLASCO
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A designated property manager may sign and prosecute an uncontested residential eviction for nonpayment of rent on behalf of a corporate landlord without requiring attorney representation.
[1] A corporation, unlike a natural person, cannot represent itself and must appear in court through an attorney.
[2] A corporation may not be represented in court by a non-lawyer, even if that non-lawyer is the corporation's sole stockholder or member.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“a corporation, unlike a natural person, cannot represent itself and cannot appear in a court of law without an attorney”
General rule stated but subject to limited exception for uncontested residential evictions
Altamar 1, LLC filed an eviction complaint for nonpayment of rent without seeking recovery of past due rent and submitted a resolution authorizing its…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed September 27, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D23-0255 Lower Tribunal No. 22-41287 CC
________________
Altamar 1, LLC,
Appellant,
vs.
Adalgisa Nolasco,
Appellee.
An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Michael G. Barket, Judge. Hazel Law P.A., and Robin F. Hazel (Hollywood), for appellant. No appearance for appellee. Before LOGUE, C.J., and EMAS and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM.
Altamar 1, LLC (landlord) appeals from an order of dismissal for failure to comply with a court order to timely secure counsel pursuant to Nicholson Supply Co. v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n of Hardee Cnty., 184 So. 2d 438 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966). Ordinarily, a corporate entity may not be represented by a non-lawyer. Szteinbaum v. Kaes Inversiones y Valores, C.A., 476 So. 2d 247, 248 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (stating that “a corporation, unlike a natural person, cannot represent itself and cannot appear in a court of law without an attorney”). This is true even if the non-lawyer is the corporation’s sole stockholder or member. See Fla. Bar v. The Embassy of Heaven Church, 761 So. 2d 1053, 1055 (Fla. 2000) (citing Richter v. Higdon Homes, Inc., 544 So. 2d 300, 300 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)). However, a limited exception has been recognized by the Florida Supreme Court to permit designated property managers to sign a complaint and prosecute uncontested residential evictions for nonpayment of rent on behalf of both individual and corporate landlords. Fla. Bar re Advisory Opinion--Nonlawyer Preparation of & Representation of Landlord in Uncontested Residential Evictions, 627 So. 2d 485, 487 (Fla. 1993); cf. Pomales v. Aklipse Asset Mgmt., Inc., 336 So. 3d 785, 786 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (reversing voluntary dismissal filed by representative of landlord corporation in contested eviction action where tenants objected, sought trial and award of attorney’s fees, and corporation failed to comply with order requiring corporation to appear through counsel). Here, the landlord’s complaint contained a single count for eviction for nonpayment of rent, and did not seek the recovery of past due rent. Further, the landlord filed a copy of its resolution designating the property manager as authorized to file evictions on its behalf. After service of process on the tenant and the tenant’s failure to file an answer, the clerk entered a default. As no hearing was required, the eviction was uncontested. Accordingly, the designated property manager should have been permitted to handle the uncontested residential eviction on behalf of the corporate landlord. Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Altamar 1, LLC v. Adalgisa Nolasco, 336 So. 3d 785 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023)…ehalf of both individual and corporate landlords. Fla. Bar re Advisory Opinion--Nonlawyer Preparation of & Representation of Landlord in Uncontested Residential Evictions, 627 So. 2d 485, 487 (Fla. 1993); cf. Pomales v. Aklipse Asset Mgmt., Inc., 336 So. 3d 785, 786 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (reversing voluntary dismissal filed by representative of landlord corporation in contested eviction action where tenants objected, sought trial and award of attorney’s fees, and corporation failed to comply with order --…
-
Yacht Assist, Inc. v. CRP LMC Prop CO LLC (Fla. 4th DCA 2022)…in, 195 P. 2d 867, 867 (Cal. Dist. Ct. App. 1948)). Thus, “[i]t is well recognized that a corporation, unlike a natural person, cannot represent itself and cannot appear in a court of law without an attorney.” Pomales v. Aklipse Asset Mgmt., Inc., 336 So. 3d 785, 786 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (quoting Szteinbaum v. Kaes Inversiones y Valores, C.A., 476 So. 2d 247, 248 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)); see also Parrott Cove Marina, LLC v. Duncan Seawall Dock & Boatlift, Inc., 978 So. 2d 811, 813 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008); Daytona Migi…
-
Lamaze v. Lorna M. Guthrie (Fla. 4th DCA 2025)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Szteinbaum v. Kaes Inversiones y Valores, 476 So. 2d 247 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
- Richter v. Higdon Homes, Inc., 544 So. 2d 300 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)
- The Fla. Bar re Advisory Opinion-Nonlawyer Preparation of & Representation of Landlord in Uncontested Residential Evictions, 627 So. 2d 485 (Fla. 1993)
- Altamar 1, LLC v. Adalgisa Nolasco, 336 So. 3d 785 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023)
- THE Florida BAR v. The Embassy OF Heaven Church, 761 So. 2d 1053 (Fla. 2000)