JUANITA TAYLOR
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A probation revocation order must be corrected when it identifies violation of a standard probation condition rather than the special probation condition actually violated, even though the record clearly establishes which condition was breached.
[1] A probation revocation order containing a scrivener's error identifying the incorrect probation condition violated should be remanded for correction when the record clear…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Nowhere is it alleged Taylor violated standard condition 8.”
Court identifying the discrepancy between the order and the affidavit of violation
Juanita Taylor violated her probation and admitted the violation in a hearing. The order revoking probation listed standard condition 8 as violated, b…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Affidavit Of Violation Of Probation cases and more on FLexlaw
December 29, 2023 SOUD, J.
In this Anders* appeal, Appellant Juanita Taylor appeals her judgment and sentence following her violation of probation. We
* See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
affirm. However, we remand this matter to the trial court for correction of a scrivener’s error in the order revoking probation. See Carmona v. State, 363 So. 3d 1115 (Fla. 5th DCA 2023).
More specifically, the order revoking probation identifies Taylor violated three conditions: condition 2 (Failure to pay cost of supervision), condition 3 (Changing residence without first procuring the consent of the probation officer—absconding), and condition 8 (Failure to work diligently at lawful occupation, advise employer of probation status, support dependents). However, the affidavit of violation of probation identifies, inter alia, violation of special condition 8 by failing to complete 100 hours of community service. Nowhere is it alleged Taylor violated standard condition 8.
The totality of the record before us, including the transcript of the hearing during which Taylor admitted her violation of probation, makes clear it was special condition 8 she acknowledged having violated. Accordingly, this case is AFFIRMED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS to correct the scrivener’s error in the order revoking probation to properly identify violation of special condition 8 (Failure to complete 100 hours of community service).
It is so ordered.
BOATWRIGHT and KILBANE, JJ., concur.
_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
_____________________________
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Taylor v. State (Fla. 5th DCA 2023)…ntence following her violation of probation. We * See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). affirm. However, we remand this matter to the trial court for correction of a scrivener’s error in the order revoking probation. See Carmona v. State, 363 So. 3d 1115 (Fla. 5th DCA 2023). More specifically, the order revoking probation identifies Taylor violated three conditions: condition 2 (Failure to pay cost of supervision), condition 3 (Changing residence without first procuring the consent of the probation…
-
Taylor v. State (Fla. 5th DCA 2023)…ntence following her violation of probation. We * See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). affirm. However, we remand this matter to the trial court for correction of a scrivener’s error in the order revoking probation. See Carmona v. State, 363 So. 3d 1115 (Fla. 5th DCA 2023). More specifically, the order revoking probation identifies Taylor violated three conditions: condition 2 (Failure to pay cost of supervision), condition 3 (Changing residence without first procuring the consent of the probation…
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Taylor v. State (Fla. 5th DCA 2023)