MIRON 2319, LLC
v.
CITY OF HOLLYWOOD, FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
When a water meter fails, the city may bill for past unbilled usage calculated by averaging the 12 months immediately preceding the meter failure, and the trial court must properly calculate that average before enforcing collection.
[1] When a water utility meter is defective, the ordinance requires the average monthly usage for calculating past unbilled charges to be determined from the 12-month period…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“the previous 12 months necessarily refers to the period immediately preceding the unbilled usage period for which the city sought additional payment due to the meter malfunction”
Court's interpretation of the Hollywood ordinance provision regarding which 12-month period to use for calculating average monthly water usage when a meter has been defective
The City of Hollywood notified Miron 2319, LLC that it owed payment for water delivered but not billed due to a defective meter that failed in June 20…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Jeffrey R. Levenson, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE18- 001510.
John M. Bernazzoli, Hollywood, and Melissa A. Giasi of Giasi Law, P.A., Tampa, for appellant.
Kendra S. Breeden, City Attorney’s Office, Hollywood, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The City of Hollywood administers water to utility customers like Miron 2139, LLC. The City notified Miron that it owed money for water delivered but not billed due to a defective water meter. Miron sought to enjoin the City from collecting payment and now appeals from summary judgment denying its request. We affirm with one exception.
The 2014 amendment to section 51.075(B) of the Hollywood Code of Ordinances states:
In case the meter has been found to be defective or has ceased to register, the amount of usage to be billed for the period the meter was not functioning properly shall be determined by taking the average monthly usage for the previous 12 months. The City can then bill for past unbilled usage for a period up to 60 months. As we explained in Hollywood Park Apartments South, LLC v. City of Hollywood, 361 So. 3d 356, 362 (Fla. 4th DCA 2023), “the previous 12
2
months necessarily refers to the period immediately preceding the unbilled usage period for which the city sought additional payment due to the meter malfunction.”
In this case, the meter failed in June 2011. For purposes of calculating the average monthly usage, the previous twelve months is June 2010 to May 2011. Here, the circuit court did not calculate the monthly usage during that period. As such, we reverse and remand to allow the circuit court to determine Miron’s average monthly usage for the period from June 2010 to May 2011.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. CONNER, KUNTZ and ARTAU, JJ., concur.
* * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Miron 2319, LLC v. City of Hollywood, 361 So. 3d 356 (Fla. 4th DCA 2024)…properly shall be determined by taking the average monthly usage for the previous 12 months. The City can then bill for past unbilled usage for a period up to 60 months. As we explained in Hollywood Park Apartments South, LLC v. City of Hollywood, 361 So. 3d 356, 362 (Fla. 4th DCA 2023), “the previous 12 months necessarily refers to the period immediately preceding the unbilled usage period for which the city sought additional payment due to the meter malfunction.” In this case, the meter failed in June 2…
-
Henriette LaFrance v. Guardian Advocacy of Jayden Emile, 401 So. 3d 379 (Fla. 4th DCA 2025)
-
Pacheco v. Waldo Acebo, M.D., P.A. (Fla. 3d DCA 2025)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Miron 2319, LLC v. City of Hollywood, 361 So. 3d 356 (Fla. 4th DCA 2024)